AICPA CPA-Auditing Exam - Topic 1 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Auditing exam

Question #: 113
Topic #: 1

[All CPA-Auditing Questions]

In testing for unrecorded retirements of equipment, an auditor most likely would:

ASelect items of equipment from the accounting records and then locate them during the plant tour.

BCompare depreciation journal entries with similar prior-year entries in search of fully depreciated equipment.

CInspect items of equipment observed during the plant tour and then trace them to the equipment subsidiary ledger.

DScan the general journal for unusual equipment additions and excessive debits to repairs and maintenance expense.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Choice 'a' is correct. Tracing (old) equipment recorded in the books to the actual equipment during a plant tour is a control which tests for unrecorded retirements.

Choice 'b' is incorrect. Determining which assets are fully depreciated does not tell you which ones are retired, as fully depreciated assets may continue to be used.

Choice 'c' is incorrect. Selecting items from the plant tour and then tracing them to the equipment subsidiary ledger will provide evidence that all equipment is recorded. It will not detect whether recorded equipment has been retired. (This step is backwards.)

Choice 'd' is incorrect. Scanning the general journal for unusual equipment additions and excessive debits to repairs and maintenance expense provides evidence regarding fixed asset additions, not retirements.

by Jenifer at Jul 06, 2025, 10:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPA-Auditing Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Haydee

2 months ago

B could work too, especially for spotting fully depreciated stuff.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

2 months ago

Wait, how can you be sure all equipment is even there during the tour?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

3 months ago

Totally agree, C is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilda

3 months ago

D seems a bit off for this situation, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

3 months ago

I think option C makes the most sense for tracking unrecorded retirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yvonne

3 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I think tracing equipment from the tour back to the ledger is a solid method, so I lean towards option C as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawny

4 months ago

I feel like scanning the general journal for unusual entries could help, but I can't recall if that's the best approach for this specific situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blair

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about comparing depreciation entries being useful for spotting unrecorded retirements. Maybe option B?

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

4 months ago

I think option C makes the most sense since we need to verify what we see during the plant tour against the records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenore

4 months ago

Scanning the general journal for unusual equipment additions or high repair/maintenance expenses could be a good way to uncover potential unrecorded retirements. I'll make sure to keep an eye out for those types of transactions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyra

4 months ago

I think the key is to inspect the equipment I observe during the plant tour and then trace it back to the subsidiary ledger. That way I can identify any items that aren't properly recorded.

upvoted 0 times

...

William

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. Should I be comparing the depreciation entries to prior years to look for fully depreciated equipment? Or is that not the best approach here?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward audit procedure to test for unrecorded retirements. I'd probably start by selecting some equipment items from the accounting records and then physically locating them during the plant tour.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

7 months ago

I think B is the correct answer, it seems like the most logical approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

7 months ago

I'm leaning towards D, it makes more sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronika

7 months ago

I'm feeling a bit rusty on this topic, but I think option C is the way to go. Gotta love those plant tours, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Roosevelt

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards option D actually. Unusual additions and excessive expenses could indicate something fishy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherrie

6 months ago

I think option A might also be a good approach. It's always helpful to physically locate the equipment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryln

7 months ago

I agree, option C seems like the most logical choice. Plant tours can be quite informative.

upvoted 0 times

...

Orville

7 months ago

Option B seems like a good way to find fully depreciated equipment, but I wonder if the auditor might miss any equipment that wasn't fully depreciated yet. I'll go with C to be safe.

upvoted 0 times

Lawanda

6 months ago

I agree, it's important to trace the equipment to the subsidiary ledger to ensure accuracy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

7 months ago

I think option C is a good choice because it involves physically inspecting the equipment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivan

8 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janna

8 months ago

Haha, option A reminds me of that time I lost my car keys during a plant tour. Definitely going with C on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Halina

8 months ago

I think the answer is A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilberto

8 months ago

Option D sounds interesting, but I'm not sure scanning the general journal would be the most efficient approach. I'd go with B to compare depreciation entries.

upvoted 0 times

Vincent

7 months ago

Scanning the general journal for unusual additions and excessive repairs expenses could help uncover unrecorded retirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincenza

7 months ago

I think inspecting items of equipment during the plant tour and tracing them to the ledger could also be effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

7 months ago

I agree, comparing depreciation entries seems like a logical way to identify unrecorded retirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

8 months ago

I think option C is the best choice here. Tracing observed equipment to the ledger is a more reliable way to identify unrecorded retirements.

upvoted 0 times

Valentine

7 months ago

It's important to ensure that all equipment observed during the tour is accurately recorded in the ledger to prevent any discrepancies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

7 months ago

Tracing observed equipment to the ledger during the plant tour is a thorough approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salley

8 months ago

I agree, option C seems like the most effective method to detect unrecorded retirements.

upvoted 0 times

...