Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AHIP AHM-530 Exam - Topic 2 Question 35 Discussion

The following situations illustrate violations of federal antitrust laws:Situation A Two HMOs split a large employer group by agreeing to let one HMO market to some company employees and to let the second HMO market to different company employees.Situation B Members of a physician-hospital organization (PHO) that has significant market share jointly agreed to exclude a physician from joining the PHO solely because that physician has admitting privileges at a competing hospital.From the following answer choices, select the response that best identifies the types of violations illustrated by these situations:
A) Situation A: horizontal division of territories; Situation B: group boycott
B) Situation A: horizontal division of territories; Situation B: exclusive arrangement
C) Situation A: exclusive arrangement; Situation B: group boycott
D) Situation A: exclusive arrangement; Situation B: tying arrangement

AHIP AHM-530 Exam - Topic 2 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-530 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 2
[All AHM-530 Questions]

The following situations illustrate violations of federal antitrust laws:

Situation A Two HMOs split a large employer group by agreeing to let one HMO market to some company employees and to let the second HMO market to different company employees.

Situation B Members of a physician-hospital organization (PHO) that has significant market share jointly agreed to exclude a physician from joining the PHO solely because that physician has admitting privileges at a competing hospital.

From the following answer choices, select the response that best identifies the types of violations illustrated by these situations:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Tiera at May 06, 2022, 07:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AHM-530 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lucia
11 months ago
I thought tying arrangements were more common in these cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
11 months ago
Seems like an exclusive arrangement for Situation B to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about Situation B being a group boycott?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
I agree, that’s textbook antitrust violation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
11 months ago
Situation A is definitely a horizontal division of territories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
12 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question says the traffic from R1 to R3 is still going through R2, even though the metric to R4 was set to 15. I wonder if changing the cost on the R1-R4 link would do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
12 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. A "rubber-hose" attack is when you try to extract cryptographic secrets through physical means, like torture or coercion. The answer has to be B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
12 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the question is asking about removing only the MDM-delivered content, not the entire device. Based on that, the answer has to be Selective Wipe. That allows you to remove just the corporate data without wiping the whole device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where land revaluation was the main focus, and it definitely highlighted changes in comprehensive income.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
12 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know hard links can be useful, but there must be some downsides. I'll need to read through the options carefully to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
12 months ago
I've got this! The two actions are "accept" and "relay". The ESA uses those to handle LDAP queries and responses. Easy peasy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel