AHIP AHM-520 Exam - Topic 6 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-520 exam

Question #: 97
Topic #: 6

Federal law addresses the relationship between Medicare- or Medicaid contracting health plans and providers who are at "substantial financial risk."

Under federal law, Medicare- or Medicaid-contracting health plans

A Place a provider at "substantial risk" whenever incentive arrangements put the provider at risk for amounts in excess of 10% of his or her total potential reimbursement for providing services to Medicare and Medicaid enrollees

B) Must provide stop-loss coverage to a provider who is placed at "substantial financial risk" for services that the provider does not directly provide to Medicare or Medicaid enrollees

ABoth A and B

BA only

CB only

DNeither A nor B

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Bulah at Sep 13, 2024, 02:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AHM-520 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Viola

10 months ago

I thought it was only A that applied. Confusing!

upvoted 0 times

...

Julianna

10 months ago

Both A and B are correct under federal law.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jonell

10 months ago

Wait, are we sure about the stop-loss coverage? Sounds too good to be true.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

10 months ago

Totally agree, that 10% threshold is a big deal!

upvoted 0 times

...

Shayne

11 months ago

A provider is at substantial risk if they can lose over 10% of their reimbursement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franchesca

11 months ago

I recall that both A and B have specific implications under federal law, but I can't remember if they both need to be true for the answer to be "Both A and B."

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

11 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the 10% threshold mentioned in A. Does that mean any risk above that automatically qualifies as "substantial"?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalind

11 months ago

I think I came across a similar question in practice that emphasized the stop-loss coverage requirement. I feel like B might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jody

11 months ago

I remember studying the definitions of "substantial financial risk," but I'm not entirely sure if it applies to both A and B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearlene

11 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to re-read the question a few times to make sure I'm not missing any important details before selecting an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyndy

11 months ago

I've got this! The key is understanding what constitutes "substantial financial risk" for providers. Based on the question, that seems to be the main focus, so I'll start there in formulating my answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leoma

11 months ago

I'm a little confused by the wording of the answer choices. I need to carefully read through each one to determine which one best matches the information provided in the question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ezekiel

11 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gayla

12 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the relationship between Medicare/Medicaid contracting health plans and providers who are at "substantial financial risk." I'll need to focus on the specific requirements under federal law.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dell

1 year ago

Wait, is this question sponsored by the Department of Obscure Healthcare Regulations? I'm in trouble...

upvoted 0 times

Elliott

1 year ago

Yeah, it's important to protect providers who are taking on significant financial risk in their contracts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Danilo

1 year ago

I agree, it makes sense that Medicare- or Medicaid-contracting health plans would have to provide stop-loss coverage to providers at substantial financial risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathrine

1 year ago

I think the answer is A) Both A and B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chan

1 year ago

I bet the person who wrote this question is sitting back, sipping their coffee, and chuckling at the poor souls trying to decipher it.

upvoted 0 times

Karol

1 year ago

D) Neither A nor B

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonna

1 year ago

C) B only

upvoted 0 times

...

Vanna

1 year ago

A) Both A and B

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomas

1 year ago

Hold on, are they really asking me to memorize the specific percentages and requirements for stop-loss coverage? That seems a bit excessive.

upvoted 0 times

Cherry

1 year ago

It's always good to stay informed about the regulations to avoid any issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

1 year ago

I think it's important to know the details to ensure compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenora

1 year ago

I agree, it does seem like a lot to remember.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

1 year ago

Hmm, I think I need to brush up on my federal healthcare regulations before tackling this one. All these acronyms and terms are making my head spin!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

1 year ago

That's a good point, but I still think both A and B are necessary to ensure providers are adequately protected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earnestine

1 year ago

Wow, this question is tricky! I'm not sure if I fully understand the nuances of 'substantial financial risk' for providers under Medicare and Medicaid.

upvoted 0 times