Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AHIP AHM-520 Exam - Topic 3 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-520 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 3
[All AHM-520 Questions]

One true statement about a type of capitation known as a percent-of-premium arrangement is that this arrangement

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tawny at Sep 14, 2024, 02:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AHM-520 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hyman
4 months ago
I thought all capitation was about fixed payments per member.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
4 months ago
Yeah, limiting risk makes it less attractive for providers, totally!
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure it transfers risk to providers? That sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
4 months ago
I agree, it’s more about risk transfer than just reimbursement amounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
5 months ago
A percent-of-premium arrangement is definitely not the most common type of capitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
5 months ago
I vaguely recall that capitation usually involves a set dollar amount per member, but I can't remember if that applies to percent-of-premium specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
5 months ago
I keep mixing up the definitions of capitation types, so I’m uncertain if limiting risk makes it less attractive to providers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
5 months ago
I feel like option D sounds familiar because it mentions risk transfer, which is something we discussed in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
5 months ago
I think I remember that percent-of-premium arrangements are not the most common type of capitation, but I'm not sure what the most common one is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I know percent-of-premium is a type of capitation, but I can't recall the specifics of how it differs from the other options. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through the differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
5 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about capitation arrangements in class. I believe a percent-of-premium setup is where the provider gets a percentage of the premium instead of a set dollar amount per member. That sounds like it would transfer risk to the provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
5 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is D - a percent-of-premium arrangement transfers some of the risk from the health plan to the provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. The options seem pretty similar, and I'm having trouble distinguishing between them. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
10 months ago
This question is like a financial sudoku puzzle, but I think I've got it figured out. Option D is the way to go, it's the only one that really makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Katy
9 months ago
I'm not sure about option A being the most common type of capitation, but option D definitely seems like the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
10 months ago
I think option C is also a good choice, setting reimbursement at a specific dollar amount per plan member can be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
10 months ago
I agree, option D is the best choice. It makes sense to transfer some of the risk to the provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angelyn
11 months ago
Option A seems tempting, but I don't think it's the most common type of capitation. I'm going to go with option D, it makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Kiley
9 months ago
Option B is less attractive to providers when limiting risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
10 months ago
I think option C sets a specific dollar amount per plan member.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
10 months ago
I agree, option D transfers some of the risk to the provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ethan
11 months ago
Haha, this question is like a game of financial Russian roulette! I'll go with option C - setting a specific dollar amount per plan member sounds like the safest bet to me.
upvoted 0 times
Serina
10 months ago
I agree with you, setting a specific dollar amount per plan member does seem like a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
10 months ago
I'm not so sure about that, I think option D might actually be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
10 months ago
I think option C is a good choice too, it does sound like a safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tuyet
11 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question is a bit tricky, but I'm leaning towards option D. It seems like the percent-of-premium arrangement shifts some of the risk to the provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
11 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Percent-of-premium arrangements transfer some of the risk to the provider, making it less attractive when there are provisions to limit that risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but C also sounds plausible as it mentions specific dollar amount per plan member
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
11 months ago
I agree with Margart, D makes sense because it mentions transferring risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
11 months ago
I think the answer is D
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but C also sounds plausible to me
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
11 months ago
I agree with Xochitl, D makes sense because it mentions transferring risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
12 months ago
I think the correct answer is D
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel