Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AHIP AHM-510 Exam - Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-510 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All AHM-510 Questions]

Arthur Dace, a plan member of the Bloom health plan, tried repeatedly over an extended period to schedule an appointment with Dr. Pyle, his primary care physician (PCP). Mr. Dace informally surveyed other Bloom plan members and found that many people were experiencing similar problems getting an appointment with this particular provider. Mr. Dace threatened to take legal action against Bloom, alleging that the health plan had deliberately allowed a large number of patients to select Dr. Pyle as their PCP, thus making it difficult for patients to make appointments with Dr. Pyle.

Bloom recommended, and Mr. Dace agreed to use, an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) method that is quicker and less expensive than litigation. Under this ADR method, both Bloom and Mr. Dace presented their evidence to a panel of medical and legal experts, who issued a decision that Bloom's utilization management practices in this case did not constitute a form of abuse. The panel's decision is legally binding on both parties.

Different types of compensation arrangements in managed care plans, from fee-for-service (FFS) arrangements to capitation arrangements, lead to different types of fraud and abuse. From the answer choices below, select the response that identifies the form of abuse in which Bloom is allegedly engaging, according to Mr. Dace's complaint, and whether this form of abuse is more likely to occur in FFS compensation arrangements or in capitation arrangements.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lawrence
5 months ago
I think it could be FFS too, not just capitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
5 months ago
This is so frustrating! I've heard similar stories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
Wait, how can they prove it was deliberate?
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
5 months ago
Totally agree, it's definitely a capitation issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
5 months ago
Sounds like underutilization to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The first step is to break the SnapMirror relationship on each individual volume. Then I need to configure the destination SVM volumes for data access. Finally, I'll need to stop the source SVM before activating the destination SVM. Feels like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Is there a specific setting or configuration I need to look for to link the ACD Queue to the RP? I'll need to review the SIP Server documentation to make sure I understand the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
6 months ago
I thought it might only be 10 percent, but then again, large departments could warrant more security powers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
6 months ago
Ah I see, the 'rpc' style means the root element can't be 'employeeHours' as needed. Changing it to 'document' style should fix that issue. Option A seems like the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll have to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand what they're asking.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel