Adobe AD0-E906 Exam - Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E906 exam

Question #: 10
Topic #: 1

A proof is configured with a mull) stage automated workflow the design team often has to edit these proofs before they are moved to legal and financial for review. Which proof permission role do the design team members need?

AAuthor

BReviewer

CApprover

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The Author permission role is necessary for the design team members who need to edit the proofs before they are sent for review by legal and financial teams. This role allows them to make changes directly to the proof and upload new versions, which is essential for their work in this multi-stage automated workflow.

Author role: Grants permission to edit and manage the proof, which includes uploading new versions and making changes to the existing proof content.

Options B (Reviewer) and C (Approver) are more restrictive roles that do not allow for editing proofs.

Refer to Workfront Proofing roles and permissions documentation for more information on the different proof roles.

by Audra at Sep 14, 2024, 05:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E906 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Teresita

3 months ago

Really? I thought they needed more permissions for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clare

3 months ago

Surprised this is even a question, it's clearly Author!

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

3 months ago

No way, Approver won't let them edit!

upvoted 0 times

...

Gennie

4 months ago

I think Reviewer might be enough, but not sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blythe

4 months ago

They definitely need the Author role to make edits.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shakira

4 months ago

It feels like the Author role makes the most sense, but I could see how the Reviewer might be involved too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I believe the Approver role is for final sign-offs, not for editing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerri

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about the Reviewer role being more about feedback rather than making edits.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margret

5 months ago

I think the design team needs the Author role since they are editing the proofs before sending them for review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

5 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. Based on the information provided, the design team members would need the "Author" permission role in order to edit the proofs before they are sent for final review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. The design team is editing the proofs before they go to legal and financial review, so they probably need more permissions than just a standard "Viewer" role. I'm leaning towards "Author" as the best answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. The question mentions a "multi-stage automated workflow", so I'm wondering if the design team might need a different permission level like "Reviewer" to make edits.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelaide

5 months ago

This looks like a straightforward question about proof permissions. I think the design team members need the "Author" role to be able to edit the proofs before they are sent for review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryanne

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. The wording about the "multi-stage automated workflow" is throwing me off. I'm not sure if the design team would need "Author" or "Reviewer" permissions. I'll have to think about this one a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eden

1 year ago

The Approver role seems like overkill for the design team. They're the ones creating the proofs, not the ones giving the final stamp of approval.

upvoted 0 times

Jean

1 year ago

B) Reviewer

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlean

1 year ago

A) Author

upvoted 0 times

...

Kassandra

1 year ago

I bet the design team members wish they had the Approver role so they could just approve their own work and skip all the reviews! But that's probably not a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

Pauline

1 year ago

C) Approver

upvoted 0 times

...

Candra

1 year ago

B) Reviewer

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

1 year ago

A) Author

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuonne

1 year ago

Definitely the Reviewer role. They need to be able to make changes and comments before the proofs are approved, but not actually approve them themselves.

upvoted 0 times

Melodie

1 year ago

Reviewer

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozelle

1 year ago

Reviewer

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

1 year ago

Reviewer

upvoted 0 times

...

Thomasena

1 year ago

Reviewer

upvoted 0 times

...

Lore

1 year ago

I disagree, I think the design team members need the Reviewer role to provide feedback on the proofs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kasandra

1 year ago

I agree with Frederica, the Author role makes sense because they need to edit the proofs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

1 year ago

I think the design team members need the Author permission role to edit the proofs before sending them to legal and financial review. That makes the most sense to me.

upvoted 0 times