Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E716 Exam - Topic 1 Question 64 Discussion

An Adobe Commerce developer has been asked to modify the PageBuilder slider content type to allow a new custom content type (other than slide) to be assigned as a child. The developer has already created the new content type called improved_slide in their module. They now need to create a new view/adminhtml/pagebuilder/content_type/slider. xml file in their module to allow the new content type to be a child of slider content types.What is the correct xml to accomplish this?A)B)C)
B) Option B
A) Option A
C) Option C

Adobe AD0-E716 Exam - Topic 1 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E716 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 1
[All AD0-E716 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce developer has been asked to modify the PageBuilder slider content type to allow a new custom content type (other than slide) to be assigned as a child. The developer has already created the new content type called improved_slide in their module. They now need to create a new view/adminhtml/pagebuilder/content_type/slider. xml file in their module to allow the new content type to be a child of slider content types.

What is the correct xml to accomplish this?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The following XML will allow the new content type to be a child of slider content types:

<type>slider</type>

<children>

<type>improved_slide</type>

</children>

Use code with caution.https://bard.google.com/faq

This XML will tell Magento that the slider content type can have improved_slide content types as children.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Arthur
3 days ago
Is it really that easy to add a custom type?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
8 days ago
Wait, why would we need a new content type for sliders?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
13 days ago
Not sure about Option C, seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
18 days ago
I think Option B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
24 days ago
Option A looks solid for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
29 days ago
I’m not entirely confident, but I think the attributes in Option A look familiar for defining custom content types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
1 month ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question like this before, and I think the correct XML needs to specify the type correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
1 month ago
I think it might be Option B, but I’m a bit confused about how to properly define the parent-child relationship in the XML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
1 month ago
I remember we practiced something similar in class, but I’m not sure if the structure for the new content type should be nested like that.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel