Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E716 Exam - Topic 1 Question 64 Discussion

Posted by Eun on Jul 18, 2026 at 04:16 AM

An Adobe Commerce developer has been asked to modify the PageBuilder slider content type to allow a new custom content type (other than slide) to be assigned as a child. The developer has already created the new content type called improved_slide in their module. They now need to create a new view/adminhtml/pagebuilder/content_type/slider. xml file in their module to allow the new content type to be a child of slider content types.

What is the correct xml to accomplish this?

A)

B)

C)

Suggested Answer: B

The following XML will allow the new content type to be a child of slider content types:

<type>slider</type>

<children>

<type>improved_slide</type>

</children>

Use code with caution.https://bard.google.com/faq

This XML will tell Magento that the slider content type can have improved_slide content types as children.


Get Premium AD0-E716 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
18 comments · newest first
CH
Chana 2 days ago
I just hope I pick the right one in the exam.
HY
Hyun 7 days ago
Exactly! It covers all necessary attributes.
DE
Denny 12 days ago
I see your point, but B seems more detailed.
CH
Chana 17 days ago
But A looks more straightforward to me.
HY
Hyun 22 days ago
It has the right structure for child content types.
DE
Denny 27 days ago
Why B?
CH
Chana 1 month ago
I feel like Option A might be correct.
HY
Hyun 1 month ago
Definitely! I’m leaning towards Option B.
DE
Denny 1 month ago
I think this question is tricky.
AR
Arthur 2 months ago
Is it really that easy to add a custom type?
KI
Kirk 2 months ago
Wait, why would we need a new content type for sliders?
LO
Louisa 2 months ago
Not sure about Option C, seems off to me.
BE
Belen 2 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go!
JE
Jessenia 2 months ago
Option A looks solid for this setup.
TH
Theodora 2 months ago
I’m not entirely confident, but I think the attributes in Option A look familiar for defining custom content types.
CA
Cathrine 3 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question like this before, and I think the correct XML needs to specify the type correctly.
LY
Lyla 3 months ago
I think it might be Option B, but I’m a bit confused about how to properly define the parent-child relationship in the XML.
RO
Rosamond 3 months ago
I remember we practiced something similar in class, but I’m not sure if the structure for the new content type should be nested like that.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel