New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E708 Exam - Topic 4 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E708 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E708 Questions]

A small merchant is using a legacy 3rd-party module to integrate with a payment provide. This module takes the cardholder information

What changes must be made to the 3rd-party modules to reduce the scope of their Self-Assessment Questionaire?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Vi at May 23, 2024, 02:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E708 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tamesha
3 months ago
Totally agree, HTTPS should be standard for all payment integrations!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
3 months ago
Storing credentials encrypted is definitely a good practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
3 months ago
Wait, can a VPN really reduce the scope? Not so sure about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
4 months ago
I think the iframe system is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
4 months ago
Using HTTPS is a must for secure connections!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
4 months ago
I feel like a VPN might not directly reduce the scope of the questionnaire. It seems more about securing the connection rather than handling cardholder data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we discussed encrypting credentials. That seems relevant, but I wonder if it’s enough on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think using HTTPS is important for security. Could that help with the questionnaire too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
5 months ago
I remember something about reducing PCI scope by using a payment provider's iframe. That might be option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. Using a VPN or HTTPS protocol seems like a good way to secure the connection. Storing credentials encrypted is also important. I'm leaning towards C or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the security implications of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the key is to focus on reducing the scope of the 3rd-party module's access to sensitive cardholder data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Utilizing the payment provider's frontend iframe system looks like the best way to minimize the 3rd-party module's access to cardholder data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
5 months ago
Port scanning is the method used to identify and exploit vulnerabilities in systems and applications. That's the technique I'm most familiar with for this type of task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking if the given command will ensure encrypted overlay traffic between service tasks. The key part seems to be the `--secure` flag, which I'm guessing is supposed to enable some kind of encryption. I'll have to double-check the Docker documentation to see if that's the correct interpretation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
9 months ago
Option D all the way! Utilizing the payment provider's frontend iframe system is like letting them do all the heavy lifting. Sit back, relax, and let the experts handle it. What could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Marion
8 months ago
D) Utilize the payment provider's frontend iframe system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
8 months ago
C) Use the HTTPS protocol to connect to the payment provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
9 months ago
B) Store credentials encrypted in the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozell
9 months ago
Ah, the good old VPN (option A). Definitely a classic, but I'm not sure it's the most elegant solution these days. Gotta stay on top of the latest and greatest, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
9 months ago
Hold up, option C is where it's at! Using HTTPS to connect to the payment provider is a no-brainer. Can't have those payment details floating around in plain text, can we?
upvoted 0 times
Bettina
8 months ago
D: Absolutely, we can't take any chances with payment details. HTTPS is a must-have for secure transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
8 months ago
C: Using HTTPS is a basic security measure that should always be in place when dealing with sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
8 months ago
B: Yeah, HTTPS is a must for secure connections. Can't risk any data breaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
8 months ago
A: I agree, option C is definitely the way to go. We need to keep those payment details secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raymon
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Storing credentials encrypted in the database (option B) seems like a good idea too. Gotta keep those payment details secure, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
9 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Using the payment provider's frontend iframe system will help reduce the scope of the SAQ, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
Tori
8 months ago
Jeff: It's important to take all necessary measures to protect sensitive data and comply with security standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
8 months ago
User 2: Definitely, utilizing the payment provider's frontend iframe system is a secure way to handle cardholder information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeann
8 months ago
User 1: I agree, option D seems like the best choice to reduce the scope of the SAQ.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felicia
10 months ago
I think storing credentials encrypted in the database is also important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
10 months ago
I agree with Brendan, using HTTPS will help reduce the scope of the Self-Assessment Questionaire.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
11 months ago
I think we should use the HTTPS protocol to connect to the payment provider.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel