New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E208 Exam - Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E208 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All AD0-E208 Questions]

Consider the following eVar settings:

eVar #: 3

Name: Model Name

Allocation: Most Recent (Last)

Expire After: Visit

Type: Text String

Status: Enabled

An automotive company uses eVar3 to capture "Model Name" on certain model-specific pages of their website. The VP of Marketing expresses a concern about data quality after seeing a report of eVar3 paired with the Visits metric. The report shows a significant number of visits with a Model Name of "Unspecified".

What is causing this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The reason why the report shows a significant number of visits with a Model Name of ''Unspecified'' is that the visits began on a page where eVar3 was not set. Since eVar3 is set to expire after visit and has an allocation of most recent (last), it means that it will capture and persist the last value that was set for that variable in a visit. If eVar3 was not set on any page during a visit, it will show up as ''Unspecified'' in the report. eVar3 being never set due to a tagging error in the page code or having too many unique values are not likely causes of this issue.

References: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/analytics/components/variables/conversion-variables/conversion-var-overview.html?lang=en https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/analytics/components/variables/conversion-variables/conversion-var-overview.html?lang=en#expiration


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Chaya
3 months ago
I disagree, it’s probably just a page issue, not a coding error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
3 months ago
Wait, "Unspecified"? That seems odd!
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
4 months ago
Definitely a coding issue, can't be too many unique values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
4 months ago
I think it's just visits from pages without the eVar set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
4 months ago
Sounds like a tagging error to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
4 months ago
I feel like the visits could start on a page without the eVar set, which would lead to "Unspecified" values. So, option B makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
4 months ago
I think option C is unlikely because it mentions too many unique values, but I don't recall that being a common issue with eVars.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like we practiced a question where a similar issue was caused by a tagging error. That could be option A, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how eVars can sometimes show "Unspecified" if they're not set on certain pages. I think it might be related to option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if the problem is with the eVar settings, the tagging, or something else. I'll need to review the details carefully and think through the possible causes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
I think the key here is to understand how the eVar is being used and where the data is coming from. The settings look right, so the issue is likely in the page tagging or the logic for setting the eVar value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different eVar settings and how they might be causing the "Unspecified" values. I'll need to think through this carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about eVar data quality. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The eVar is set to "Most Recent (Last)" allocation, so the value should be captured on the last page the visitor viewed. The "Unspecified" values suggest the eVar is not being set properly somewhere.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about property boundaries. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one best fits the context provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Let me think through the options carefully and try to remember the main reasons for job analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
5 months ago
This question seems to be testing my knowledge of BGP and how the "remove-private" command works. I'll need to think through the implications of that command and how it might impact the AS-Path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
5 months ago
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act sounds like it could be the right answer, since it's focused on protecting against cyber threats. I'll double-check the details of that law to make sure it matches the question.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel