Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E117 Exam - Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

Posted by Bethanie on Jul 02, 2026 at 12:03 PM

AEM Site users report that the web content pages render very slowly. An Architect notices that the CPU usages of the AEM Publish instances are spiking and reviews the following entry in the log:

[Frt Nov 27 23:11:00 2019] [I] [pid 16004 (tid 140134145820416)] Current cache hit ratio: 47.94 %

What should the Architect do to increase the dispatcher cache ratio and prevent the AEM Publish CPU usage spikes?

Suggested Answer: A

According to Adobe Experience Manager documentation5, dispatcher is a caching and load balancing tool that can be used to improve performance and security of AEM sites.Dispatcher cache configuration can be adjusted using various properties in the dispatcher.any file6. Creating a cron job that will delete the dispatcher cache on a regular basis is not a good idea as it will reduce the cache hit ratio and increase the load on AEM servers.


Get Premium AD0-E117 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
CL
Clorinda 4 days ago
Option C seems risky. Deleting cache regularly might hurt performance.
EV
Evan 9 days ago
I feel like adding more instances won't solve the root issue.
RE
Ressie 14 days ago
Option B could work too, but it’s more of a band-aid solution.
NA
Nakisha 20 days ago
Agreed! A higher cache hit ratio means less load on the CPU.
SA
Sabra 25 days ago
I think option A is the best. Optimizing the cache can really help.
AL
Alesia 30 days ago
Let’s hope we get this right!
BO
Bong 1 month ago
I’d go with A as well.
DE
Denny 1 month ago
True, A feels like the safest bet.
HE
Helga 2 months ago
D could help, but it's costly.
AL
Alesia 2 months ago
Yeah, deleting cache regularly? Not ideal.
BO
Bong 2 months ago
C seems counterproductive.
DE
Denny 2 months ago
More instances might reduce load.
AL
Alesia 2 months ago
I agree, but B could work too.
HE
Helga 2 months ago
Optimizing the cache can really help performance.
DE
Denny 3 months ago
Why A?
HE
Helga 3 months ago
I think option A is the best.
DE
Denny 3 months ago
This question is tricky.
JO
Josphine 3 months ago
I’m surprised the cache hit ratio is so low, thought it would be better!
RO
Rosalind 3 months ago
Wait, deleting the cache regularly? That sounds counterproductive!
MA
Mattie 3 months ago
Adding more servers (D) might help, but it’s not a long-term fix.
DA
Dalene 4 months ago
Totally agree, better cache means less CPU strain!
LY
Lynette 4 months ago
A) Review and optimize the Dispatcher cache configuration is the way to go.
CH
Christa 4 months ago
Adding more dispatcher servers could distribute the load better, but I wonder if that’s really addressing the root cause. I’m leaning towards A, but I’m not completely confident.
ST
Stevie 4 months ago
I think we went over a similar question where deleting the cache regularly was mentioned. But creating a cron job feels risky; it might not really help with the cache hit ratio.
SH
Sheron 4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but adding more AEM instances might help with the CPU spikes. That sounds like B, but I feel like it could just be a temporary fix.
NO
Novella 4 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of optimizing the Dispatcher cache configuration in class. It seems like A could be the right choice.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel