Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E117 Exam - Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

AEM Site users report that the web content pages render very slowly. An Architect notices that the CPU usages of the AEM Publish instances are spiking and reviews the following entry in the log:[Frt Nov 27 23:11:00 2019] [I] [pid 16004 (tid 140134145820416)] Current cache hit ratio: 47.94 %What should the Architect do to increase the dispatcher cache ratio and prevent the AEM Publish CPU usage spikes?
A) Review and optimize the Dispatcher cache configuration
B) Add additional AEM instances to the Publish Farm
C) Create a cron job that will delete the dispatcher cache on a regular basis
D) Add additional dispatcher servers

Adobe AD0-E117 Exam - Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E117 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E117 Questions]

AEM Site users report that the web content pages render very slowly. An Architect notices that the CPU usages of the AEM Publish instances are spiking and reviews the following entry in the log:

[Frt Nov 27 23:11:00 2019] [I] [pid 16004 (tid 140134145820416)] Current cache hit ratio: 47.94 %

What should the Architect do to increase the dispatcher cache ratio and prevent the AEM Publish CPU usage spikes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

According to Adobe Experience Manager documentation5, dispatcher is a caching and load balancing tool that can be used to improve performance and security of AEM sites.Dispatcher cache configuration can be adjusted using various properties in the dispatcher.any file6. Creating a cron job that will delete the dispatcher cache on a regular basis is not a good idea as it will reduce the cache hit ratio and increase the load on AEM servers.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Helga
2 hours ago
D could help, but it's costly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
5 days ago
Yeah, deleting cache regularly? Not ideal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
10 days ago
C seems counterproductive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
16 days ago
More instances might reduce load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
21 days ago
I agree, but B could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
26 days ago
Optimizing the cache can really help performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 month ago
Why A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
1 month ago
I think option A is the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 month ago
This question is tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
2 months ago
I’m surprised the cache hit ratio is so low, thought it would be better!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
2 months ago
Wait, deleting the cache regularly? That sounds counterproductive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
2 months ago
Adding more servers (D) might help, but it’s not a long-term fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
Totally agree, better cache means less CPU strain!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
2 months ago
A) Review and optimize the Dispatcher cache configuration is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
2 months ago
Adding more dispatcher servers could distribute the load better, but I wonder if that’s really addressing the root cause. I’m leaning towards A, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
3 months ago
I think we went over a similar question where deleting the cache regularly was mentioned. But creating a cron job feels risky; it might not really help with the cache hit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but adding more AEM instances might help with the CPU spikes. That sounds like B, but I feel like it could just be a temporary fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
3 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of optimizing the Dispatcher cache configuration in class. It seems like A could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel