MENU
One final means of concealing a register scheme, as with many kinds of fraud, is to destroy all records of the transaction.
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CFE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
NA
Naomi
11 months ago
I think it's true, but it's still a dumb move overall.
AS
Asha
11 months ago
Seems risky, what if something gets missed?
AD
Adolph
11 months ago
Really? Can you actually destroy all records?
ST
Stephaine
12 months ago
Totally agree, it makes sense to cover your tracks.
WI
William
12 months ago
That's definitely a common tactic in fraud.
CA
Cassie
12 months ago
I practiced a question about concealment tactics in fraud cases, and it suggested that destroying records is a common method, so I’m thinking this is true.
FR
Frank
1 year ago
I feel like this could go either way. Destroying records seems like a way to conceal things, but I wonder if there are other ways to hide a scheme too.
MA
Margurite
1 year ago
I remember a similar question about fraud prevention methods, and I think they emphasized the importance of keeping records instead. So, I might lean towards false.
WH
Whitley
1 year ago
I think this might be true because destroying records would definitely help in hiding fraudulent activities, but I'm not entirely sure.
OR
Orville
1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I think the key is understanding that the question is about concealing a register scheme specifically. Destroying records seems like it could be an effective way to hide the evidence, so I'm leaning towards true on this.
MA
Margret
1 year ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Wouldn't destroying the records just make it look suspicious? I'm not sure that's a reliable way to conceal a scheme. I might need to re-read the question and think about it some more.
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Destroying records would make it harder to track the transaction, so that seems like a logical way to conceal a register scheme. I'm going to go with true on this one.
EM
Emelda
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Destroying records could potentially hide evidence, but I'm not confident that it's a definitive way to conceal a register scheme. I'll have to think this through more.
AB
Abraham
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward true/false question. I'll read through the statement carefully and think about whether destroying records would be a way to conceal a register scheme.
BE
Ben
1 year ago
Destroying records? That's a bold move, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for them. I'll choose 'False' and hope for the best.
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
I agree, 'False' seems like the safer option. Let's hope it doesn't backfire.
TA
Tammy
1 year ago
I think it's 'False' as well. It's a risky move, but it might work.
YU
Yuette
1 year ago
I'll go with 'False' too. It seems risky to destroy all records.
MA
Mariann
1 year ago
Destroying records? What is this, a bad spy movie? 'False' is the way to go, my friend.
NO
Noe
1 year ago
I agree, 'False' is definitely the right answer here.
MA
Maryann
1 year ago
Exactly, destroying records is not a good idea in any situation.
KR
Kris
1 year ago
False
FL
Floyd
2 years ago
Ah, the old 'destroy the evidence' trick. Straight out of the fraudster's playbook. I'll go with 'False' and call it a day.
GA
Gail
1 year ago
Ah, the old 'destroy the evidence' trick. Straight out of the fraudster's playbook. I'll go with 'False' and call it a day.
GO
Golda
1 year ago
B) False
ES
Estrella
1 year ago
A) True
GL
Glenna
2 years ago
Destroying all records? That's just asking for trouble! I'll stick with a solid 'False' on this one.
SU
Susy
2 years ago
True. If there are no records, it's harder to prove the fraud.
MA
Marisha
2 years ago
False. Destroying records is not a good solution, it's better to report it.
HA
Haydee
2 years ago
True. It's a way to cover up the fraud.