Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACFE CFE Exam - Topic 2 Question 88 Discussion

Posted by Micheline on Mar 05, 2026 at 03:35 PM

What is sometimes used to overcome well-designed internal controls of a victim company?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium CFE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
FL
Florencia 2 months ago
True, but A) Shell company is a classic tactic. Hard to trace back.
MA
Marti 2 months ago
But B) Fraudulent invoices can also bypass controls. They look legit.
NY
Nydia 2 months ago
I agree, Alex. It’s hard to detect when people work together.
LE
Lewis 2 months ago
I think C) Collusion is the answer. It’s sneaky.
CA
Carmelina 2 months ago
B) Fraudulent invoices are common, but they usually get caught.
ER
Erasmo 3 months ago
A) Shell company could work too, but collusion feels more direct.
CL
Cletus 3 months ago
I agree, collusion can bypass controls easily.
GO
Goldie 3 months ago
I think C) Collusion is the answer. It’s sneaky.
NI
Nieves 3 months ago
Shell companies can also hide the truth. Tough choice!
TR
Tracey 3 months ago
I’m leaning towards fraudulent invoices. They look legit.
SH
Shawna 3 months ago
Definitely! It bypasses controls easily.
HA
Hannah 4 months ago
I think collusion is the answer. It’s sneaky.
AL
Allene 4 months ago
I agree with C) Collusion, but it seems risky!
RO
Rocco 4 months ago
Wait, are people really still using B) Fraudulent invoices?
GE
Georgene 5 months ago
I thought D) Rubber stamp supervisors was a bit outdated?
GO
Golda 6 months ago
A) Shell company is a classic tactic too.
CH
Cherri 6 months ago
Definitely C) Collusion, it's sneaky!
DA
Daniel 6 months ago
Totally agree, collusion is a big issue!
JU
Juan 6 months ago
Wait, rubber stamp supervisors? Really?
ER
Ernestine 6 months ago
Shell companies are a classic tactic too.
ID
Idella 6 months ago
I think fraudulent invoices are more common.
KI
Kimberlie 7 months ago
Definitely collusion, it's sneaky!
OC
Octavio 7 months ago
Fraudulent invoices seem like a plausible option too, but I remember discussing how collusion is often more effective against strong controls.
LI
Lilli 7 months ago
I'm leaning towards collusion as the answer, but I can't recall if rubber stamp supervisors could also play a role in this.
LE
Leonora 7 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question similar to this before, and I think shell companies were mentioned as a way to commit fraud.
RO
Rolland 7 months ago
I think I remember something about collusion being a common tactic to bypass internal controls, but I'm not entirely sure.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel