Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE Exam - Topic 2 Question 88 Discussion

What is sometimes used to overcome well-designed internal controls of a victim company?
C) Collusion
A) Shell company
B) Fraudulent invoices
D) Rubber stamp supervisors

ACFE CFE Exam - Topic 2 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 2
[All CFE Questions]

What is sometimes used to overcome well-designed internal controls of a victim company?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Micheline at Mar 05, 2026, 03:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Florencia
4 days ago
True, but A) Shell company is a classic tactic. Hard to trace back.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
9 days ago
But B) Fraudulent invoices can also bypass controls. They look legit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
15 days ago
I agree, Alex. It’s hard to detect when people work together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
20 days ago
I think C) Collusion is the answer. It’s sneaky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
25 days ago
B) Fraudulent invoices are common, but they usually get caught.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 month ago
A) Shell company could work too, but collusion feels more direct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
1 month ago
I agree, collusion can bypass controls easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
1 month ago
I think C) Collusion is the answer. It’s sneaky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
2 months ago
Shell companies can also hide the truth. Tough choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards fraudulent invoices. They look legit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
2 months ago
Definitely! It bypasses controls easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
2 months ago
I think collusion is the answer. It’s sneaky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
2 months ago
I agree with C) Collusion, but it seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
2 months ago
Wait, are people really still using B) Fraudulent invoices?
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
4 months ago
I thought D) Rubber stamp supervisors was a bit outdated?
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
4 months ago
A) Shell company is a classic tactic too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
4 months ago
Definitely C) Collusion, it's sneaky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
4 months ago
Totally agree, collusion is a big issue!
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
5 months ago
Wait, rubber stamp supervisors? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
5 months ago
Shell companies are a classic tactic too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
5 months ago
I think fraudulent invoices are more common.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
5 months ago
Definitely collusion, it's sneaky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
5 months ago
Fraudulent invoices seem like a plausible option too, but I remember discussing how collusion is often more effective against strong controls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards collusion as the answer, but I can't recall if rubber stamp supervisors could also play a role in this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
6 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question similar to this before, and I think shell companies were mentioned as a way to commit fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
6 months ago
I think I remember something about collusion being a common tactic to bypass internal controls, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel