Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE-Law Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Evidence that tends to make some tact at issue more or less likely than it would be without the evidence is called:
A) Circumstantial evidence
B) Testamentary evidence
C) Demonstrative evidence
D) Relevant evidence

ACFE CFE-Law Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Law exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 1
[All CFE-Law Questions]

Evidence that tends to make some tact at issue more or less likely than it would be without the evidence is called:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Van at May 07, 2024, 09:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Law Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Paris
6 months ago
Wow, I didn't know that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
6 months ago
I thought it was demonstrative evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not circumstantial?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
7 months ago
Totally agree, relevant evidence is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
7 months ago
It's called relevant evidence!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards D as well, but I wonder if there’s a nuance I’m missing about circumstantial evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
8 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen this concept before, but I can’t recall the exact term. Maybe it’s C, demonstrative evidence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
8 months ago
I’m not too sure, but I remember something about circumstantial evidence being used in similar questions. Could that be A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
8 months ago
I think the answer might be D, relevant evidence, since it directly relates to making something more or less likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Circumstantial evidence is the right answer here - it's the kind of evidence that makes an issue more or less likely, rather than directly proving or disproving it. I'll mark that down confidently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the difference between them. Maybe I'll jot down a quick note to revisit this question later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward evidence question. I'll read through the options carefully and think about which one best describes evidence that affects the likelihood of an issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
8 months ago
Wait, is it really just that simple? I feel like there's more nuance to this concept that I'm missing. I'd better review my notes on the different types of evidence before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
8 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the purpose of a security assessment plan. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different options, and I'm not sure which one would be the best fit for this environment. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
1 year ago
I bet the test writers were chuckling when they came up with 'Testamentary evidence' as an option. Nice try, but I'm sticking with D.
upvoted 0 times
Lynsey
11 months ago
I see where you're coming from, but I still think 'Demonstrative evidence' could also fit the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
12 months ago
I think 'Circumstantial evidence' could also be a possibility, but D seems like the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
1 year ago
Yeah, 'Testamentary evidence' definitely seems like a distractor. Relevant evidence makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
1 year ago
I agree, 'Testamentary evidence' does sound like a tricky option. I'm going with D too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kallie
1 year ago
Ha! Testamentary evidence? Really? That's a bit of a stretch. I'm going with D) Relevant evidence.
upvoted 0 times
Alaine
12 months ago
I'm with you guys, relevant evidence is the most logical choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
1 year ago
Yeah, I think relevant evidence is more solid and directly related to the issue at hand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
1 year ago
I agree, testamentary evidence seems a bit far-fetched. Relevant evidence is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rex
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to guess C) Demonstrative evidence, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
Jeanice
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) Testamentary evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
12 months ago
I believe it's D) Relevant evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
12 months ago
I think it might be A) Circumstantial evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcom
1 year ago
I think A) Circumstantial evidence is the right answer here. It's the most logical choice in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Jose
1 year ago
D) Relevant evidence is crucial to proving a case beyond a reasonable doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
1 year ago
I think C) Demonstrative evidence can also be very persuasive in court.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
1 year ago
But B) Testamentary evidence is also important in legal proceedings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 year ago
I agree, A) Circumstantial evidence is based on inference rather than direct observation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Remedios
1 year ago
Definitely D) Relevant evidence. This is the most accurate description of the concept being tested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Relevant evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
I agree with Lynda, Circumstantial evidence makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Circumstantial evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel