MENU
Evidence that tends to make some tact at issue more or less likely than it would be without the evidence is called:
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CFE-Law Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
PA
Paris
11 months ago
Wow, I didn't know that!
RO
Ronny
11 months ago
I thought it was demonstrative evidence.
DO
Dominque
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not circumstantial?
BR
Brande
12 months ago
Totally agree, relevant evidence is key.
HU
Hubert
12 months ago
It's called relevant evidence!
RO
Rose
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards D as well, but I wonder if there’s a nuance I’m missing about circumstantial evidence.
PA
Patria
1 year ago
I feel like I’ve seen this concept before, but I can’t recall the exact term. Maybe it’s C, demonstrative evidence?
MO
Mohammad
1 year ago
I’m not too sure, but I remember something about circumstantial evidence being used in similar questions. Could that be A?
BU
Buck
1 year ago
I think the answer might be D, relevant evidence, since it directly relates to making something more or less likely.
ST
Stephania
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Circumstantial evidence is the right answer here - it's the kind of evidence that makes an issue more or less likely, rather than directly proving or disproving it. I'll mark that down confidently.
GA
Galen
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the difference between them. Maybe I'll jot down a quick note to revisit this question later.
LA
Lakeesha
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward evidence question. I'll read through the options carefully and think about which one best describes evidence that affects the likelihood of an issue.
BE
Bernardo
1 year ago
Wait, is it really just that simple? I feel like there's more nuance to this concept that I'm missing. I'd better review my notes on the different types of evidence before answering.
CO
Corazon
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the purpose of a security assessment plan. I think I can handle this one.
FE
Felice
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different options, and I'm not sure which one would be the best fit for this environment. I'll need to think it through carefully.
HO
Hollis
1 year ago
I bet the test writers were chuckling when they came up with 'Testamentary evidence' as an option. Nice try, but I'm sticking with D.
LY
Lynsey
1 year ago
I see where you're coming from, but I still think 'Demonstrative evidence' could also fit the description.
AN
Annett
1 year ago
I think 'Circumstantial evidence' could also be a possibility, but D seems like the safest choice.
JE
Jess
1 year ago
Yeah, 'Testamentary evidence' definitely seems like a distractor. Relevant evidence makes more sense.
DE
Desmond
1 year ago
I agree, 'Testamentary evidence' does sound like a tricky option. I'm going with D too.
KA
Kallie
1 year ago
Ha! Testamentary evidence? Really? That's a bit of a stretch. I'm going with D) Relevant evidence.
AL
Alaine
1 year ago
I'm with you guys, relevant evidence is the most logical choice in this situation.
TH
Theresia
1 year ago
Yeah, I think relevant evidence is more solid and directly related to the issue at hand.
AR
Arminda
1 year ago
I agree, testamentary evidence seems a bit far-fetched. Relevant evidence is definitely the way to go.
RE
Rex
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to guess C) Demonstrative evidence, but I'm not 100% sure.
JE
Jeanice
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards B) Testamentary evidence.
GE
German
1 year ago
I believe it's D) Relevant evidence.
CH
Chan
1 year ago
I think it might be A) Circumstantial evidence.
MA
Malcom
2 years ago
I think A) Circumstantial evidence is the right answer here. It's the most logical choice in my opinion.
JO
Jose
1 year ago
D) Relevant evidence is crucial to proving a case beyond a reasonable doubt.
RE
Renay
1 year ago
I think C) Demonstrative evidence can also be very persuasive in court.
DO
Dorinda
1 year ago
But B) Testamentary evidence is also important in legal proceedings.
AL
Alesia
1 year ago
I agree, A) Circumstantial evidence is based on inference rather than direct observation.
RE
Remedios
2 years ago
Definitely D) Relevant evidence. This is the most accurate description of the concept being tested.
OR
Orville
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Relevant evidence.
AN
Antonio
2 years ago
I agree with Lynda, Circumstantial evidence makes sense.
LY
Lynda
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Circumstantial evidence.