MENU
During an internal investigation Todd a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) interviewed Janessa a fraud suspect Although Janessa wanted to leave in the middle of the interview, Todd blocked the exit and prevented her from leaving Janessa subsequently confessed to committing fraud If under these facts Janessa files a lawsuit (or false imprisonment against Todd, Todd will likely
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CFE-Law Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
KA
Kaitlyn
11 months ago
Not so sure about that, seems like a gray area to me.
GL
Glynda
11 months ago
I think he could win if he claims qualified privilege.
CH
Charlene
11 months ago
Wait, can he really block someone from leaving like that?
LE
Letha
12 months ago
Totally agree, sounds like a clear case of false imprisonment.
LE
Lenny
12 months ago
Todd might lose if he restrained her without consent.
JU
Judy
12 months ago
I feel like the key issue is whether Todd had legal justification. I vaguely recall a case that was similar, but I can't remember the details.
SH
Shantay
1 year ago
I’m really uncertain about this one. Did we cover if someone can be held against their will during an interview?
AV
Avery
1 year ago
I think Todd might lose the case if it's shown he restrained Janessa without her consent. That sounds familiar from our practice questions.
TO
Tomas
1 year ago
I remember discussing something about qualified business privilege in class, but I'm not entirely sure how it applies here.
TO
Tony
1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Based on the details provided, it seems like Todd would likely win since he was acting in his professional capacity as a CFE and had a qualified privilege to conduct the interview.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on analyzing the specific facts around Todd's actions and whether they were reasonable and legally justified given his role as a CFE conducting an investigation.
MA
Madonna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. The key seems to be whether Todd had legal justification to prevent Janessa from leaving. I'll have to think through the details closely.
KA
Karan
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the legal principles around false imprisonment and qualified business privilege.
LO
Lonna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Screen Flows can use different types of elements, but I'm not sure which one would be best for a user selection. I'll have to think it through carefully.
BL
Blondell
1 year ago
Alright, this looks straightforward. Option A seems to have the right steps - choose the pod name for the Console identifier, generate the DaemonSet file, and apply it to the twistlock namespace. I'm pretty confident that's the way to go.
KA
Kanisha
1 year ago
I think "Standards of fieldwork" might be the right answer, but I'm not 100% sure. We discussed how important they are in class.
LE
Letha
1 year ago
Oof, this is a tough one. I'd say Todd's best bet is to plead ignorance, but I don't know if that's gonna fly. Looks like he's in for a long legal battle either way.
CE
Ceola
1 year ago
Haha, I bet Todd wishes he had taken a few lessons in hostage negotiation before this interview. Janessa's probably gonna have the last laugh on this one.
LE
Leigha
1 year ago
Haha, I bet Todd wishes he had taken a few lessons in hostage negotiation before this interview. Janessa's probably gonna have the last laugh on this one.
LO
Lorenza
1 year ago
B) Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Janessa without consent or legal justification
SA
Sanjuana
1 year ago
A) Win the case because he is protected under the qualified business privilege
BE
Benedict
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced. Janessa wanted to leave, but Todd was just doing his job as a Certified Fraud Examiner. I reckon he's got a strong case under the qualified business privilege.
VE
Venita
1 year ago
D) Win the case if he did not know the conduct was illegal
FA
Farrah
1 year ago
I agree, Todd was just doing his job and had the right to prevent Janessa from leaving.
SH
Sharika
1 year ago
B) Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Janessa without consent or legal justification
PA
Paz
1 year ago
A) Win the case because he is protected under the qualified business privilege
PI
Pilar
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but it's possible that Todd could still win the case under qualified business privilege.
MA
Marva
2 years ago
But what if Todd didn't know his conduct was illegal? Would that change things?
EN
Enola
2 years ago
Wow, this is a tricky one. I think Todd is in hot water here. Blocking someone from leaving an interview is a big no-no, even if they're a fraud suspect. That's just asking for trouble.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
D) Win the case if he did not know the conduct was illegal
AM
Ammie
1 year ago
B) Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Janessa without consent or legal justification
MA
Marylou
1 year ago
A) Win the case because he is protected under the qualified business privilege
LY
Lynette
1 year ago
I agree, Todd should have handled the situation differently.
HE
Hester
2 years ago
B) Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Janessa without consent or legal justification
EL
Elliot
2 years ago
A) Win the case because he is protected under the qualified business privilege
PI
Pilar
2 years ago
I think Todd might lose the case if he restrained Janessa without consent.