Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE-Law Exam - Topic 1 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Law exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 1
[All CFE-Law Questions]

Greg is serving as an expert witness and is being cross-examined at trial. The questioning party gets Greg to state that he spent considerable time working on a certain issue in the case. Then the questioning party asks many questions on a tangential issue in the case that Greg knows little about. Which of the following describes the questioning party's method?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lashandra at Mar 19, 2024, 02:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Law Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dean
5 months ago
I don't think it's a personal attack, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
5 months ago
Sounds like myopic vision to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
5 months ago
Wait, is this really a common strategy? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
5 months ago
Totally agree, they’re just trying to confuse him!
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
6 months ago
This is a classic tactic in cross-examination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
6 months ago
I thought bias was more about the witness's perspective rather than the questioning method. This one's tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
6 months ago
I feel like the questioning party is trying to distract Greg from his expertise, which seems like a personal attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
6 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where the focus was on misdirection in questioning. I think it might be myopic vision, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
6 months ago
I remember we discussed how cross-examination can sometimes lead to confusion, but I'm not sure which term fits best here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
6 months ago
Ah, the old bait-and-switch. The lawyer's trying to make the expert look bad by getting them to admit ignorance on a tangential issue. Gotta be ready for that kind of tactic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
6 months ago
Aha, I think this is a case of the lawyer trying to get the witness off-balance by shifting the focus to an area they're less familiar with. Gotta stay sharp and not get flustered!
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'd need to think through the different options and try to identify the key elements of the questioning strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
7 months ago
This seems like a classic tactic to try to trip up the expert witness. I'd focus on staying calm and sticking to the facts I'm most knowledgeable about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
7 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the statements, I'll need to read them closely to make sure I understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
7 months ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused about this question. I'm not sure how the stopped metadata server will impact the backup process. I'll need to review the material again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
7 months ago
"Presolicitation" definitely rings a bell as an initial phase. I'm leaning towards "Postsolicitation" being the answer since it sounds less familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
2 years ago
Could this be considered a form of bias since they are not focusing on the relevant information?
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 years ago
Maybe the questioning party is trying to distract from the main issue by going off on a tangent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
2 years ago
I agree, it's a way to undermine Greg's credibility by focusing on something he's not familiar with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
2 years ago
It seems like a tactic to throw Greg off and discredit his expertise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
2 years ago
I think the questioning party is trying to confuse Greg.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 years ago
It could be seen as myopic vision, focusing on one small aspect rather than the big picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
2 years ago
I would say that's a form of bias, trying to make Greg look incompetent in areas he isn't familiar with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
2 years ago
Yeah, it seems like a tactic to throw him off and discredit his expertise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 years ago
I think the questioning party is trying to confuse Greg.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel