Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam - Topic 3 Question 60 Discussion

Beta, a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE). is conducting an admission-seeking interview of Gamma, a fraud suspect. After Beta gave Gamma an appropriate rationalization for his conduct, Gamma continued his denials, giving various alibis. These alibis can usually be diffused by all of the following techniques EXCEPT:
D) Downplaying the strength of the evidence
A) Discussing the testimony of witnesses
B) Displaying physical evidence
C) Discussing Gamma's prior deceptions

ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam - Topic 3 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Investigation exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 3
[All CFE-Investigation Questions]

Beta, a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE). is conducting an admission-seeking interview of Gamma, a fraud suspect. After Beta gave Gamma an appropriate rationalization for his conduct, Gamma continued his denials, giving various alibis. These alibis can usually be diffused by all of the following techniques EXCEPT:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by An at Nov 16, 2022, 01:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Investigation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jestine
9 months ago
Witness testimony can really shake things up, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
9 months ago
Totally agree, physical evidence is hard to argue against!
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
9 months ago
Wait, can you really diffuse alibis like that? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
9 months ago
I think downplaying evidence just makes it worse!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
9 months ago
Discussing prior deceptions is key in these interviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
9 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like discussing Gamma's prior deceptions is definitely a valid technique, so maybe the answer is downplaying evidence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
9 months ago
I think displaying physical evidence is a strong tactic, but I can't recall if discussing witness testimony is always effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like downplaying the strength of the evidence might not really diffuse an alibi effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
10 months ago
I remember we discussed how discussing prior deceptions can really undermine a suspect's credibility, so I think that's a technique that could work here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
10 months ago
Okay, I think I get it. Accessibility needs to be a priority from the very beginning, not just an afterthought. That makes sense. I'll make sure to keep that in mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. If we're only given the contract, how can we do white box testing? Isn't that usually done with access to the internal code? I'll have to review my notes on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
10 months ago
Hmm, the image isn't super clear, but I think it's related to IBM Cloud services. I'll need to read the options closely to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel