MENU
Barnes, a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE). is using data analysis to identify anomalies that might indicate fraud in XYZ Company's accounts payable transactions. Which of the following is the MOST EFFECTIVE data analysis function that Barnes could use to look for potential fraud in accounts payable?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CFE-Investigation Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
44 comments · newest first
SA
Salena
11 months ago
Surprised that C is the top choice, I would’ve picked A!
LE
Lelia
11 months ago
D covers all bases, can't go wrong with that!
AL
Alayna
11 months ago
Really? I thought A would be more effective.
NI
Nieves
12 months ago
Totally agree, C is key for catching discrepancies!
EL
Eleonore
12 months ago
C seems like the best option for spotting fraud.
VA
Val
12 months ago
I'm torn between options. "All of the above" seems safe, but I wonder if one function is really more effective than the others for this specific scenario.
YU
Yuonne
1 year ago
Reviewing recurring monthly expenses and comparing them to posted invoices sounds familiar. I think it could help spot duplicate payments or unauthorized expenses.
DE
Deonna
1 year ago
I think identifying paycheck amounts over a certain limit could be useful, but it feels more related to payroll fraud than accounts payable.
MI
Mike
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how comparing book and tax depreciation can reveal discrepancies, but I'm not sure if it's the best choice for accounts payable specifically.
OM
Omega
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by this question. Aren't all of those options potentially useful for identifying fraud? I'm not sure I can confidently pick just one as the "most effective." Maybe I should try to explain the pros and cons of each approach in my answer.
AN
Antione
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the way to go here. Reviewing those recurring monthly expenses is key to spotting any anomalies or discrepancies that could indicate fraud. I feel pretty confident that's the most effective data analysis function for this situation.
BE
Bernardo
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I was thinking option B, identifying paycheck amounts over a certain limit, might be a good approach too. But C does seem more focused on the accounts payable specifically. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd go with option C - reviewing recurring monthly expenses and comparing them to posted/paid invoices. That seems like the most effective way to identify potential fraud in the accounts payable.
RO
Rory
1 year ago
Alright, let's do this. Locate the paragraph, set the pagination, and make sure it all stays on the same page. I've got this!
ME
Melissa
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident I can figure this out. The key is to focus on the specific capabilities of an Optical Time Domain Reflectometer (OTDR) and how it can detect physical changes in the fiber.
NO
Noble
1 year ago
This question is testing our knowledge of JMS behavior, so I'll need to carefully consider each option and how it relates to message redelivery. I think the key is understanding the different ways a message processing can fail, and how JMS responds in those cases.
BE
Bette
1 year ago
Haha, I bet Barnes is wishing he had the ability to compare book and tax depreciation like in option A. That would be a real party trick!
HO
Holley
1 year ago
User 3: I think reviewing recurring monthly expenses and comparing them to invoices would also be a smart move.
VA
Vallie
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that would be a good way to spot any suspicious activity in the accounts payable transactions.
KR
Kris
1 year ago
User 1: Barnes could definitely catch some fraud by looking at paycheck amounts over a certain limit.
MA
Mammie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Identifying paycheck amounts over a certain limit could also be useful to detect potential fraud, don't you think?
MA
Marti
1 year ago
Absolutely, Barnes should consider all options to thoroughly analyze the accounts payable transactions.
JA
Jacqueline
1 year ago
True, using a combination of these functions would be the most effective approach.
RA
Raul
1 year ago
I agree, but reviewing recurring monthly expenses could also provide valuable insights.
TE
Terrilyn
1 year ago
Identifying paycheck amounts over a certain limit could definitely help in detecting fraud.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
D) All of the above
BE
Beckie
1 year ago
C) Review recurring monthly expenses and compare to posted/paid invoices
EV
Evelynn
1 year ago
B) Identify paycheck amounts over a certain limit
KR
Krissy
1 year ago
C) Review recurring monthly expenses and compare to posted/paid invoices
LE
Leonora
1 year ago
A) Compare book and tax depreciation and indicate variances
WE
Weldon
1 year ago
B) Identify paycheck amounts over a certain limit
PA
Pamela
1 year ago
A) Compare book and tax depreciation and indicate variances
DE
Delmy
2 years ago
I think option D is the best choice, as it covers all possible areas of potential fraud.
LA
Lajuana
2 years ago
I agree with Ashley, reviewing recurring monthly expenses can help identify anomalies.
AS
Ashley
2 years ago
I think option C is the most effective.
TO
Toshia
2 years ago
I think option D, all of the above, would be the best choice to cover all bases.
ST
Stevie
2 years ago
I agree with Coletta. Checking the recurring monthly expenses against the invoices is a great way to spot any suspicious activities in the accounts payable.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
User 2: True, but I believe checking paycheck amounts over a certain limit is more effective.
ME
Merilyn
1 year ago
User 1: I think comparing book and tax depreciation could also help in identifying fraud.
BE
Becky
1 year ago
User 2: True, but I believe checking paycheck amounts over a certain limit is more effective.
CL
Claribel
1 year ago
User 1: I think comparing book and tax depreciation could also help in identifying fraud.
AG
Agustin
2 years ago
I agree with Erasmo, reviewing recurring monthly expenses can help identify fraud.
ER
Erasmo
2 years ago
I think option C is the most effective.
CO
Coletta
2 years ago
Option C seems the most effective data analysis function to look for potential fraud in accounts payable. Reviewing recurring monthly expenses and comparing them to posted/paid invoices could uncover any discrepancies or anomalies.