Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACFE CFE-Fraud-Schemes-and-Financial-Crimes Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Tammy made one cash deposit each day over the span of a few weeks at automated teller machines owned by her bank. The cash deposits ranged from $9,000 to $9,900. Tammy lives in a jurisdiction that requires all deposits of $10,000 or more to be reported to the government. Based on these facts, Tammy is MOST LIKELY committing a(n):
D) Structuring scheme
A) Reverse deposit scheme
B) Remote deposit capture scheme
C) Integration scheme

ACFE CFE-Fraud-Schemes-and-Financial-Crimes Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Fraud-Schemes-and-Financial-Crimes exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All CFE-Fraud-Schemes-and-Financial-Crimes Questions]

Tammy made one cash deposit each day over the span of a few weeks at automated teller machines owned by her bank. The cash deposits ranged from $9,000 to $9,900. Tammy lives in a jurisdiction that requires all deposits of $10,000 or more to be reported to the government. Based on these facts, Tammy is MOST LIKELY committing a(n):

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Tammy is most likely committing a structuring scheme. Structuring occurs when a person deliberately breaks transactions into smaller amounts to avoid mandatory reporting thresholds. Here, Tammy repeatedly deposits cash in amounts between $9,000 and $9,900, just below the $10,000 reporting requirement. That pattern strongly indicates an attempt to avoid currency transaction reporting. A reverse deposit scheme and remote deposit capture scheme do not describe the deliberate splitting of cash deposits to evade reporting. Integration is a later stage of money laundering in which illicit funds are reintroduced into the economy as apparently legitimate funds, but Tammy's activity is focused on avoiding detection during placement. The ACFE material identifies repeated deposits just under the reporting threshold as a classic red flag of smurfing or structuring.

================


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Alyce
4 days ago
I think it's D) Structuring scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
9 days ago
This is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
15 days ago
Right! That's structuring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
20 days ago
I think it's about avoiding reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
25 days ago
This question is tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
1 month ago
Sounds like a textbook case of a reverse deposit scheme to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
1 month ago
Isn't it weird that she deposits just under $10k every time?
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
1 month ago
Wait, but what if she just has a business that needs cash?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
2 months ago
Totally agree, it's a classic structuring scheme!
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 months ago
She's definitely structuring to avoid reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
2 months ago
I thought remote deposit capture was about using technology to deposit checks, so that doesn’t seem right for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
2 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where someone was breaking up a large sum into smaller amounts. I think that’s definitely structuring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
2 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like reverse deposit schemes are more about manipulating the source of funds, not just the amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
2 months ago
I remember discussing how structuring is when someone makes smaller deposits to avoid reporting thresholds, so I think D might be the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel