U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams CKYCA Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

A politically exposed person (PEP) is eager to open a private account with an international bank. In addition to performing the normal CDD, which measure should be required from the AML officer?
B) Obtain senior management approval for establishing such business relationships.
A) Conduct enhanced ongoing monitoring of the business relationship each quarter.
C) Contact law enforcement, as PEPs pose enhanced risks to an institution.
D) Make a note of a PEP business relationship and file a suspicious transaction report to the local financial intelligence unit.

Acams CKYCA Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CKYCA exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 3
[All CKYCA Questions]

A politically exposed person (PEP) is eager to open a private account with an international bank. In addition to performing the normal CDD, which measure should be required from the AML officer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

FATF requires that before establishing a business relationship with a PEP, financial institutions must obtain senior management approval, along with applying enhanced due diligence measures such as verifying the source of wealth and funds.


by Glory at Oct 28, 2025, 06:08 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CKYCA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Peggy
3 months ago
D could be useful, but it feels reactive. Better to get approval first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
4 months ago
C seems extreme. Contacting law enforcement might not be necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
4 months ago
I agree, but A is also important. Ongoing monitoring is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
4 months ago
Isn't it surprising how many banks still overlook these risks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
4 months ago
Totally agree with B, can't take any chances with PEPs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
4 months ago
I think A is crucial too, ongoing monitoring is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
5 months ago
"PEPs, the VIPs of money laundering!" (Humorous and relevant comment)
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
5 months ago
B) Obtain senior management approval for establishing such business relationships. Gotta cover your bases when dealing with a PEP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
5 months ago
C) Contact law enforcement, as PEPs pose enhanced risks to an institution. Whoa, that's a bit extreme, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
5 months ago
D) Make a note of a PEP business relationship and file a suspicious transaction report to the local financial intelligence unit. Better safe than sorry, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
5 months ago
A) Conduct enhanced ongoing monitoring of the business relationship each quarter. Seems like a good idea to keep a close eye on a PEP's account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where filing a suspicious transaction report was emphasized, but I wonder if that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
6 months ago
I feel like contacting law enforcement might be too extreme unless there's clear evidence of wrongdoing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
6 months ago
B) Obtain senior management approval for establishing such business relationships. This is the correct answer as PEPs require enhanced due diligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
6 months ago
Definitely B, senior management needs to be involved with PEPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
6 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Senior management should approve PEP accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
6 months ago
Wait, why would we contact law enforcement? Seems extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
7 months ago
"I bet the bank's compliance team is having a field day with this one!" (Humorous comment)
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
7 months ago
I think obtaining senior management approval is crucial for PEPs, especially since they pose higher risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
7 months ago
I remember that PEPs require additional scrutiny, but I'm not sure if quarterly monitoring is enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
7 months ago
I feel pretty confident that the correct answer is option B. Obtaining senior management approval is a standard requirement when dealing with PEPs, as they present heightened money laundering and reputational risks. The other options don't seem as appropriate in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
7 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'd say the best approach is to go with option B and get senior management approval. That seems like the most prudent way to handle a PEP relationship and mitigate any potential risks to the institution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is option C the right answer? I know PEPs can pose risks, but I'm not sure if contacting law enforcement is the right step here. Maybe the enhanced ongoing monitoring in option A would be better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
8 months ago
I think the key here is that a PEP poses enhanced risks, so the AML officer should be required to obtain senior management approval for establishing the business relationship. That seems like the most appropriate measure to take.
upvoted 0 times
Misty
2 months ago
I think a suspicious transaction report is necessary too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 months ago
True, but contacting law enforcement might be overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
3 months ago
Enhanced monitoring is also important, but approval first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
3 months ago
Definitely! They can bring a lot of scrutiny.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
3 months ago
I agree, senior management approval is crucial for PEPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel