Company A is owned by Company B (80%) and Individual W (20%). Company B is owned equally by Company C and Individual X. Company C is owned by Individual Y (60%), Individual W (10%) and Individual Z (30%). Who should be considered as a beneficial owner of Company A with more than 25% shares?
Individual Y owns 60% of Company C, which owns 50% of Company B, which owns 80% of Company A.
Y's indirect ownership in Company A = 60% 50% 80% = 24%.
Additionally, Company B's other owner, Individual X, has 50% of Company B, giving X an indirect stake of 40% in Company A, but X has no further upstream ownership through C.
FATF guidance states that indirect and direct holdings should be combined where applicable. Y's 24% does not meet the 25% threshold alone, so none of the others qualify - except if local regulation treats control via majority in an intermediate entity as passing through. In that case, Y controls Company C, which controls 50% of Company B, giving effective control over 40% of Company A - meeting the threshold.
Which is a preferred source of non-documentary verification?
A credit report is a reliable non-documentary verification source because it is generated by an independent, trusted agency and contains validated personal and financial information that can help confirm a customer's identity.
A bank's business team has developed a new strategy, which includes the introduction of prepaid cards as a new high-risk product offering. The compliance team has proposed to impose a monetary limit on each prepaid card and limit the offering to the existing customers of the bank only. Which best describes the risk impact of the controls proposed by the compliance team?
Inherent risk is the natural risk before controls are applied. The compliance team's measures (monetary limits and restricting to existing customers) reduce the exposure to misuse, thereby lowering the residual risk - the risk that remains after controls are implemented.
An alert is generated by a negative media search system that an existing client is accused of money laundering and is arrested. A KYC analyst assigned to investigate finds no records of a court order or subpoen
a. Which is the next action the analyst should take?
An arrest for alleged money laundering is a serious adverse media finding that must be escalated to the compliance officer for further assessment and potential action, regardless of whether there is a conviction.
According to a reputable financial news source, a client is being taken over by one of its competitors. The public registry has not yet reflected the ownership change. Which step should the KYC analyst take?
Until the ownership change is officially recorded in a public registry, the KYC analyst should obtain legal documents directly from the client to verify the current ownership structure and maintain accurate CDD records.
Karen Edwards
1 day agoStephanie Evans
20 days agoJustin Anderson
1 month agoEric Jackson
2 months agoCrystal Bailey
2 months agoEdward Young
3 months agoRobert Wright
3 months agoMatthew Stewart
3 months agoAnthony Nelson
3 months agoDavid Hill
3 months agoMatthew Howard
3 months agoRachel Lee
2 months agoShawnta
4 months agoNu
4 months agoDorothy
4 months agoYoko
5 months agoDick
5 months agoEnola
5 months agoKiley
5 months agoDiane
6 months agoTalia
6 months agoKathrine
6 months agoEdison
6 months agoDalene
7 months agoTony
7 months agoStephen
7 months agoNarcisa
7 months agoCorinne
8 months agoEvangelina
8 months agoClay
8 months agoElliott
8 months agoJules
8 months agoLatrice
9 months agoRonald
9 months agoMarleen
9 months agoNada
9 months agoAlline
10 months agoKeneth
10 months agoElliott
10 months agoJohana
10 months agoSharee
10 months agoGwenn
11 months agoShalon
11 months agoIn
11 months ago