MENU
Which blockchain analysis red flag is linked to terrorism financing?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CCAS Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Small-value repeated payments to known extremist donation wallets are a terrorism financing indicator noted in FATF typology reports.
30 comments · newest first
JO
Josephine
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards A too. It’s a common tactic for funding.
GE
Gerri
7 months ago
True, but they’re usually for legitimate reasons. A feels more suspicious.
LA
Latrice
7 months ago
But B could also be a concern. Large OTC trades are hard to trace.
PH
Phung
7 months ago
Agreed! Small amounts can add up without raising suspicion.
HI
Hildegarde
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure about A? Seems a bit too broad to me.
CR
Cristina
8 months ago
B is definitely sketchy too, but A is more direct.
CH
Charlena
8 months ago
Really? I thought large OTC trades were more suspicious.
MI
Mindy
8 months ago
Totally agree, that’s a classic sign!
RE
Rex
9 months ago
A) Microtransactions to donation addresses is a big red flag.
YO
Youlanda
9 months ago
B) Large OTC trades? Nah, that's just Wall Street's way of laundering money, not terrorism.
MA
Martha
9 months ago
D) Smart contract creation? More like "smart" criminals trying to cover their tracks.
HE
Helaine
9 months ago
C) Proof-of-Stake staking? Really? That's like saying my grandma's knitting circle is a front for the mafia.
ER
Erick
9 months ago
A) Microtransactions to donation addresses is the correct answer. Terrorist financing often involves small, frequent transactions to avoid detection.
WI
Willow
9 months ago
Smart contract creation doesn't seem to fit either. I think it’s more about how funds are moved rather than the contracts themselves.
HE
Herminia
10 months ago
I feel like we discussed proof-of-stake in class, but I can't recall it being related to anything like terrorism financing.
OW
Owen
10 months ago
Large OTC trades seem suspicious too, especially in the context of moving large sums without much oversight. Could that be linked to terrorism financing?
JI
Jillian
10 months ago
Smart contract creation? Now that's an interesting possibility. I'll have to consider that option more closely.
RE
Reita
10 months ago
Proof-of-Stake staking? I don't see the connection there. This question is really making me think.
KA
Katie
10 months ago
Large OTC trades? That doesn't seem quite right. I'm not sure how that would be connected to terrorism financing.
JA
Janessa
10 months ago
I think A is the right choice. Microtransactions can easily hide large donations.
LO
Lorenza
11 months ago
I think I remember something about microtransactions being used for donations, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right answer here.
HA
Halina
11 months ago
Proof-of-Stake staking? More like "proof-of-lame" if you ask me.
GR
Gracia
11 months ago
C and D seem irrelevant for terrorism financing. They’re more about tech.
SA
Salome
11 months ago
Microtransactions to donation addresses - that's an interesting one. I wonder if that could be a potential link to terrorism financing.
AL
Alexia
11 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll have to think carefully about the potential red flags for terrorism financing.
JA
Jamal
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards A as well. It’s a clear red flag.
MA
Marg
6 months ago
True, but A feels more directly linked to funding.
LE
Lemuel
6 months ago
But what about B? Large OTC trades seem risky too.
IL
Ilene
6 months ago
Agreed! Small donations can add up quickly.
BR
Brendan
7 months ago
I think A is the right choice. Microtransactions can be suspicious.