Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Acams CCAS Exam - Topic 1 Question 18 Discussion

Posted by Dominque on Jul 02, 2026 at 10:10 PM

What is indirect exposure in regards to blockchain analytics transaction monitoring?

Suggested Answer: B

Indirect exposure refers to a situation where cryptoassets are not directly associated with illicit activity but have transactional links through other addresses that are associated with risky or illicit behavior. Blockchain analytics tools detect these indirect links to flagged addresses, allowing firms to assess risk based on network connections rather than direct ownership or activity.

The DFSA AML guidance and international FATF Virtual Assets guidance explain that indirect exposure is a critical concept for transaction monitoring as it broadens the detection scope beyond direct transactions, flagging assets that might be ''tainted'' through intermediary addresses.


FATF Guidance on Virtual Assets and VASPs emphasizes monitoring both direct and indirect exposure of wallets to illicit activity.

DFSA AML Module Section 13 on Suspicious Activity Reports requires firms to incorporate indirect exposure assessments in their monitoring systemsAML/VER25/05-24: Sections 4.1, 6.3, 13.3; FATF VA Guidance 2021.

Therefore, B is the correct definition.

Get Premium CCAS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
25 comments · newest first
HE
Heike 2 days ago
Exactly, B connects the dots without direct links.
LO
Lonny 7 days ago
B covers the essence of indirect exposure well.
LO
Louisa 12 days ago
But D is more about fiat, not cryptoassets directly.
EL
Elina 17 days ago
D is interesting too. It shows the fiat connection.
TA
Tammara 23 days ago
True, but B feels more accurate for indirect exposure.
SA
Sanjuana 28 days ago
I feel B covers the broader risks involved.
TO
Tonja 1 month ago
C is a strong contender. Concealment is key in analytics.
LE
Leatha 1 month ago
C could also be a contender. Mixing protocols are a big deal.
KA
Katina 1 month ago
I lean towards B. It captures the essence of indirect exposure.
CA
Catarina 2 months ago
D is interesting too. Fiat not linked is indirect exposure.
MI
Mitsue 2 months ago
But A is too direct. Indirect means less certainty.
WY
Wynell 2 months ago
C could also be valid. Mixing protocols hide the source.
IZ
Izetta 2 months ago
I agree, B feels right. It shows the link to other addresses.
AD
Adrianna 2 months ago
I think it's B. Connections to risky activity make sense.
MA
Marcelle 2 months ago
I agree, B makes sense. It highlights the indirect link.
EL
Elmira 3 months ago
I think B is the right answer. It shows the connection to risky activities.
KI
Kiley 3 months ago
D is interesting, but I’m not sure how it fits in here.
VA
Van 3 months ago
A is totally wrong; it’s not about direct links.
CA
Caitlin 3 months ago
Wait, so indirect exposure means it’s not directly linked? Sounds fishy.
RA
Rasheeda 3 months ago
I think C makes more sense, though.
LA
Lanie 4 months ago
B is the right answer, definitely!
MI
Mila 4 months ago
I recall a practice question about how fiat currency ties back to accounts, which makes me think option D could also be relevant to indirect exposure.
LA
Laticia 4 months ago
I feel like we discussed how indirect exposure doesn't directly tie a user to their assets, which could relate to option A, but I'm not confident.
VA
Vallie 4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about mixing protocols being linked to indirect exposure. Maybe that's option C?
CR
Craig 4 months ago
I think indirect exposure might relate to option B, where assets connect to risky activities through other addresses. That sounds familiar from our case studies.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel