New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AACE International AACE-PSP Exam - Topic 2 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for AACE International's AACE-PSP exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 2
[All AACE-PSP Questions]

What changes to logic would eliminate Activity B from the critical path?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Ashley at Feb 10, 2025, 04:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AACE-PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lashawna
3 months ago
Wait, can we really just replace those relationships like that? Sounds too easy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
3 months ago
Adding an FSO from A to C could really help too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
3 months ago
Not so sure about that, seems risky to change the lag to zero.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
Definitely agree with that! It simplifies things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
4 months ago
I think reducing the lag from A to B is a solid move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
I feel like replacing the relationship with FFO could work, but I need to double-check how that impacts the overall flow of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
4 months ago
Adding a SS relationship sounds familiar, but I’m confused about how that interacts with the FFO relationship mentioned in option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
4 months ago
I remember a practice question where changing relationships affected the critical path, but I can't recall if SSO is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
5 months ago
I think reducing the lag from Activity A to B might help, but I'm not entirely sure if that would eliminate B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
5 months ago
This is a good test of my understanding of critical path analysis. I'll need to carefully work through each option and evaluate how it would change the overall project schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I've practiced similar questions, so I think I know the key things to consider to eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy for this. I'll need to analyze how each of the relationship changes would impact the timing and dependencies between the activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different relationship options. I'll need to review my notes on the different types of relationships and how they can affect the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the different relationship types and how they impact the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
11 months ago
Why don't we just rearrange the activities like a game of Jenga? That'll definitely eliminate Activity B from the critical path!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
12 months ago
Reducing the lag value from 5 to 0? Sounds like a magic trick to me. What is this, a game of Tetris?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
12 months ago
Hold up, I've got a better idea. Let's replace the relationship from Activity A to Activity B with FFO and add an FSO relationship from Activity A to Activity C. That should do the trick!
upvoted 0 times
Hyman
11 months ago
I agree, let's make those changes and see if Activity B is no longer on the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
11 months ago
I think we should also consider reducing the lag value of the relationship from Activity A to Activity B from 5 to 0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
11 months ago
That sounds like a good plan. It might work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Suzi
12 months ago
Hmm, I don't think any of these options are quite right. What if we added a SS 15 relationship from Activity A to Activity B and replaced the relationship from Activity A to Activity B with FFO? That might work.
upvoted 0 times
Melodie
11 months ago
It's worth a try. Let's make those changes and see if it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
11 months ago
Maybe we should test it out and see what happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
11 months ago
I'm not sure if that would eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
11 months ago
That's an interesting idea. It could potentially work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitsue
12 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't replacing the relationship from Activity B to Activity C with SSO be a better choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
1 year ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Reducing the lag value from 5 to 0 should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Leoma
11 months ago
I agree, that change would definitely help eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Reducing the lag value from 5 to 0 should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
12 months ago
User 2: Agreed, reducing the lag value from 5 to 0 should remove Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
12 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reid
1 year ago
I think option D makes the most sense, as it involves replacing relationships and adding new ones to bypass Activity B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C would be more effective in removing Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
1 year ago
I think option A could eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel