Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AACE International AACE-PSP Exam - Topic 2 Question 31 Discussion

Posted by Ashley on Feb 10, 2025 at 04:55 AM

What changes to logic would eliminate Activity B from the critical path?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium AACE-PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
LA
Lashawna 11 months ago
Wait, can we really just replace those relationships like that? Sounds too easy.
MI
Miriam 11 months ago
Adding an FSO from A to C could really help too!
TR
Tracie 11 months ago
Not so sure about that, seems risky to change the lag to zero.
CA
Carmen 12 months ago
Definitely agree with that! It simplifies things.
DE
Denise 12 months ago
I think reducing the lag from A to B is a solid move.
FE
Felix 1 year ago
I feel like replacing the relationship with FFO could work, but I need to double-check how that impacts the overall flow of the project.
IN
Inocencia 1 year ago
Adding a SS relationship sounds familiar, but I’m confused about how that interacts with the FFO relationship mentioned in option C.
LA
Lashon 1 year ago
I remember a practice question where changing relationships affected the critical path, but I can't recall if SSO is the right choice here.
LA
Laquita 1 year ago
I think reducing the lag from Activity A to B might help, but I'm not entirely sure if that would eliminate B from the critical path.
LE
Leonard 1 year ago
This is a good test of my understanding of critical path analysis. I'll need to carefully work through each option and evaluate how it would change the overall project schedule.
TR
Truman 1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I've practiced similar questions, so I think I know the key things to consider to eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
EL
Eladia 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy for this. I'll need to analyze how each of the relationship changes would impact the timing and dependencies between the activities.
DE
Deeanna 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different relationship options. I'll need to review my notes on the different types of relationships and how they can affect the critical path.
RY
Ryan 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the different relationship types and how they impact the critical path.
PO
Portia 2 years ago
Why don't we just rearrange the activities like a game of Jenga? That'll definitely eliminate Activity B from the critical path!
LA
Lajuana 2 years ago
Reducing the lag value from 5 to 0? Sounds like a magic trick to me. What is this, a game of Tetris?
RU
Rupert 2 years ago
Hold up, I've got a better idea. Let's replace the relationship from Activity A to Activity B with FFO and add an FSO relationship from Activity A to Activity C. That should do the trick!
HY
Hyman 2 years ago
↳ replying to Rupert
I agree, let's make those changes and see if Activity B is no longer on the critical path.
KE
Kerry 2 years ago
↳ replying to Rupert
I think we should also consider reducing the lag value of the relationship from Activity A to Activity B from 5 to 0.
VE
Venita 2 years ago
↳ replying to Rupert
That sounds like a good plan. It might work.
SU
Suzi 2 years ago
Hmm, I don't think any of these options are quite right. What if we added a SS 15 relationship from Activity A to Activity B and replaced the relationship from Activity A to Activity B with FFO? That might work.
ME
Melodie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Suzi
It's worth a try. Let's make those changes and see if it works.
NO
Noelia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Suzi
Maybe we should test it out and see what happens.
CH
Chau 2 years ago
↳ replying to Suzi
I'm not sure if that would eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
SO
Solange 2 years ago
↳ replying to Suzi
That's an interesting idea. It could potentially work.
MI
Mitsue 2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't replacing the relationship from Activity B to Activity C with SSO be a better choice?
TO
Toshia 2 years ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Reducing the lag value from 5 to 0 should do the trick.
LE
Leoma 2 years ago
↳ replying to Toshia
I agree, that change would definitely help eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
KA
Kanisha 2 years ago
↳ replying to Toshia
Option B seems like the way to go. Reducing the lag value from 5 to 0 should do the trick.
TH
Theron 2 years ago
↳ replying to Toshia
User 2: Agreed, reducing the lag value from 5 to 0 should remove Activity B from the critical path.
LA
Laura 2 years ago
↳ replying to Toshia
User 1: I think option B is the best choice.
RE
Reid 2 years ago
I think option D makes the most sense, as it involves replacing relationships and adding new ones to bypass Activity B.
VE
Vernell 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C would be more effective in removing Activity B from the critical path.
EZ
Ezekiel 2 years ago
I think option A could eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel