Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AACE International AACE-PSP Exam - Topic 2 Question 12 Discussion

Posted by Edgar on May 18, 2024 at 02:19 PM

How could the structural steel drawing delay have been prevented?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium AACE-PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
LO
Loreen 11 months ago
Switching to concrete? That seems extreme!
TE
Teri 11 months ago
Surprised no one mentioned better communication!
WI
Willis 11 months ago
C sounds risky, not sure about that one.
DI
Diane 12 months ago
I think option B is the best way to go.
EL
Elli 12 months ago
A time buffer would definitely help!
PH
Phil 1 year ago
Switching to post-tensioned concrete seems like a drastic measure. I don’t recall us covering that as a solution for steel delays specifically.
CR
Crista 1 year ago
Releasing the structural steel for fabrication while reviewing sounds risky, but it might help speed things up. I’m not entirely confident about that approach.
MI
Micah 1 year ago
I think allowing adequate time for review and resubmittal is crucial. We practiced a similar question about scheduling delays last week.
LA
Lanie 1 year ago
I remember we discussed adding time buffers in class, but I'm not sure if that would really solve the issue.
PA
Paris 1 year ago
This is a good test of our understanding of project scheduling and risk management. I feel confident I can analyze the situation and select the most appropriate solution from the options provided.
TA
Tamar 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to identify the root cause of the delay and then select the option that addresses that issue most effectively. Let me review the details again.
PA
Paz 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different approaches, but I'm not sure which one would be the best solution. I'll need to think it through step-by-step.
ST
Stephanie 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about project management and scheduling. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think about the key factors involved.
OR
Oretha 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the nuances here. Is the key factor whether the deficiency has a material effect on control risk, or is it based on the entity's acceptance of the risk due to cost-benefit considerations?
AN
Anastacia 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to review my notes on the shared responsibility model for SaaS.
FA
Fallon 1 year ago
This is a good test of my Kubernetes knowledge. I'm feeling confident I can get this done, but I'll need to take my time and double-check everything before submitting. Gotta make sure that privileged pod creation is actually getting blocked at the end.
VA
Vannessa 2 years ago
Option C is like playing structural steel Tetris. I wouldn't want to be the one responsible for that gamble.
CA
Catherin 2 years ago
I'm going with B. Proactive planning is key to avoiding delays in a project like this.
BE
Beckie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catherin
C) Release the structural steel for fabrication concurrent with review of structural steel shop drawings.
OR
Oretha 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catherin
C) Release the structural steel for fabrication concurrent with review of structural steel shop drawings.
RO
Rossana 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catherin
I agree with B. Proactive planning is crucial to prevent delays.
IS
Isaac 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catherin
I agree, proactive planning is essential to prevent delays.
RA
Rachael 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catherin
B) Allow adequate time for review and resubmittal in the baseline schedule.
FR
France 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catherin
B) Allow adequate time for review and resubmittal in the baseline schedule.
AN
Annice 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catherin
A) Add a time buffer at the end of structural steel activities.
IS
Isadora 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catherin
A) Add a time buffer at the end of structural steel activities.
GO
Golda 2 years ago
C is an interesting idea, but it's a risky move. You might end up with a lot of rework if the drawings aren't approved.
MA
Martha 2 years ago
D? Really? That's a bit extreme, don't you think? Switching construction methods is a huge undertaking.
MA
Matthew 2 years ago
Option B seems like the obvious choice here. You need to plan for that review process upfront.
RE
Ressie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Matthew
Yeah, planning for review and resubmittal time is crucial in preventing delays.
MA
Marica 2 years ago
↳ replying to Matthew
I agree, adding a time buffer at the end would have helped.
MA
Mariann 2 years ago
↳ replying to Matthew
B) Allow adequate time for review and resubmittal in the baseline schedule.
JO
Josphine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Matthew
Switching to post-tensioned concrete construction could have been a drastic but effective solution.
KA
Kattie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Matthew
A) Add a time buffer at the end of structural steel activities.
DE
Devora 2 years ago
↳ replying to Matthew
I think releasing the structural steel for fabrication concurrent with review of shop drawings would have been more efficient.
RO
Rodolfo 2 years ago
↳ replying to Matthew
I agree, adding a time buffer at the end of structural steel activities could have helped.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel