New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

A10 Networks A10-System-Administration Exam - Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for A10 Networks's A10-System-Administration exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All A10-System-Administration Questions]

You are planning an Active-Active-Active VRRP-A three-device deployment that, upon failover of any device, distributes the load from a single device to both standby devices simultaneously. How many VRIDs are required?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Buddy at Jul 16, 2024, 06:28 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium A10-System-Administration Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Daniela
3 months ago
VRID Default should cover it, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
3 months ago
I thought it was just 2 VRIDs, but I guess not!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
3 months ago
Wait, are you sure it's not 5?
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
4 months ago
Totally agree, 3 is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
4 months ago
You need 3 VRIDs for that setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards 5 VRIDs, but I can't recall the exact reasoning behind it. It’s a bit confusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
If we're distributing load to both standby devices, wouldn't that mean we need more VRIDs? I feel like it's more than 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the default VRID might be enough for basic setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
5 months ago
I think we need at least one VRID for each device, so maybe 3? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
5 months ago
Wait, I'm not sure about that. Doesn't the VRID default handle some of this? I'll need to double-check the VRRP-A requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since it's an active-active-active setup, we need a VRID for each active device, so that's 3 VRIDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the active-active-active part. I'll need to review my VRRP-A notes to make sure I understand the failover behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky VRRP-A question. I'll need to think through the active-active-active setup and how the VRIDs would be distributed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. The key is that with active-active-active, each device needs its own VRID, so the answer is 3 VRIDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Journal entries, which include debits and credits, are used to update the accounting records, including the equity account. The question is asking about the specific components used to increase or decrease equity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
5 months ago
I feel like I saw something about automation in our notes, but I'm not convinced that's the core of architecture transformation. Could it really be D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
5 months ago
UPS is definitely the way to go here. It's designed to provide backup power during electrical instability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
10 months ago
Haha, this question is like a VRRP maze. I'm just going to roll the dice and pick F. 4 VRIDs, that's my final answer!
upvoted 0 times
France
8 months ago
User 3: I agree with the original comment, F) 4 VRIDs seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
8 months ago
User 2: I'm going with A) 2 VRIDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
9 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is actually C) 6 VRIDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaniqua
10 months ago
Wait, what? Active-Active-Active? Is this some kind of VRRP Inception? I'm going with B. The default VRID should be enough, right?
upvoted 0 times
Corinne
8 months ago
Yeah, B makes sense. Let's keep it simple with the default VRID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
9 months ago
I agree, let's go with B. It seems like the most logical option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
9 months ago
I think B is the right choice. The default VRID should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kindra
10 months ago
Nah, 6 VRIDs is overkill. I'm going with D. 5 VRIDs should be enough to distribute the load correctly.
upvoted 0 times
Tiara
8 months ago
Yeah, D seems like the most reasonable choice for distributing the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
9 months ago
I think 6 VRIDs would be too much, D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
9 months ago
I agree, 5 VRIDs should be sufficient for the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregoria
10 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't we need 6 VRIDs to cover all the possible failover scenarios? C seems like the right answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
10 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is E. 3 VRIDs would be required to handle the failover scenario as described.
upvoted 0 times
Latia
9 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be F. 4 VRIDs could be necessary for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
9 months ago
I disagree, I think the answer is C. 6 VRIDs would be needed for this type of deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
9 months ago
No, I believe the answer is A. 2 VRIDs are enough for the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
10 months ago
I think the answer is E. 3 VRIDs would be required to handle the failover scenario as described.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edelmira
10 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think having separate VRIDs for each device would ensure better load distribution in case of failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) 2 because we only need two VRIDs for the three-device deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
11 months ago
I think the answer is C) 6 because we need a separate VRID for each device in the Active-Active-Active setup.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel