Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

A10 Networks Exam A10-System-Administration Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for A10 Networks's A10-System-Administration exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All A10-System-Administration Questions]

You are planning an Active-Active-Active VRRP-A three-device deployment that, upon failover of any device, distributes the load from a single device to both standby devices simultaneously. How many VRIDs are required?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nelida
2 months ago
Haha, this question is like a VRRP maze. I'm just going to roll the dice and pick F. 4 VRIDs, that's my final answer!
upvoted 0 times
France
19 days ago
User 3: I agree with the original comment, F) 4 VRIDs seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
22 days ago
User 2: I'm going with A) 2 VRIDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
1 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is actually C) 6 VRIDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaniqua
3 months ago
Wait, what? Active-Active-Active? Is this some kind of VRRP Inception? I'm going with B. The default VRID should be enough, right?
upvoted 0 times
Corinne
1 months ago
Yeah, B makes sense. Let's keep it simple with the default VRID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
1 months ago
I agree, let's go with B. It seems like the most logical option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 months ago
I think B is the right choice. The default VRID should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kindra
3 months ago
Nah, 6 VRIDs is overkill. I'm going with D. 5 VRIDs should be enough to distribute the load correctly.
upvoted 0 times
Tiara
1 months ago
Yeah, D seems like the most reasonable choice for distributing the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
2 months ago
I think 6 VRIDs would be too much, D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
2 months ago
I agree, 5 VRIDs should be sufficient for the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregoria
3 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't we need 6 VRIDs to cover all the possible failover scenarios? C seems like the right answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
3 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is E. 3 VRIDs would be required to handle the failover scenario as described.
upvoted 0 times
Latia
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be F. 4 VRIDs could be necessary for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
1 months ago
I disagree, I think the answer is C. 6 VRIDs would be needed for this type of deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
2 months ago
No, I believe the answer is A. 2 VRIDs are enough for the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
2 months ago
I think the answer is E. 3 VRIDs would be required to handle the failover scenario as described.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edelmira
3 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think having separate VRIDs for each device would ensure better load distribution in case of failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) 2 because we only need two VRIDs for the three-device deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) 6 because we need a separate VRID for each device in the Active-Active-Active setup.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel