MENU
You are planning an Active-Active-Active VRRP-A three-device deployment that, upon failover of any device, distributes the load from a single device to both standby devices simultaneously. How many VRIDs are required?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium A10-System-Administration Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
DA
Daniela
10 months ago
VRID Default should cover it, right?
QU
Quentin
11 months ago
I thought it was just 2 VRIDs, but I guess not!
CR
Cruz
11 months ago
Wait, are you sure it's not 5?
RE
Refugia
11 months ago
Totally agree, 3 is the way to go!
DA
Darell
11 months ago
You need 3 VRIDs for that setup.
KA
Kassandra
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards 5 VRIDs, but I can't recall the exact reasoning behind it. It’s a bit confusing!
ST
Stephaine
12 months ago
If we're distributing load to both standby devices, wouldn't that mean we need more VRIDs? I feel like it's more than 3.
AY
Ayesha
12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the default VRID might be enough for basic setups.
JE
Jeanice
1 year ago
I think we need at least one VRID for each device, so maybe 3? But I'm not entirely sure.
LO
Loren
1 year ago
Wait, I'm not sure about that. Doesn't the VRID default handle some of this? I'll need to double-check the VRRP-A requirements.
GA
Gail
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since it's an active-active-active setup, we need a VRID for each active device, so that's 3 VRIDs.
AU
Audra
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the active-active-active part. I'll need to review my VRRP-A notes to make sure I understand the failover behavior.
LO
Lorean
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky VRRP-A question. I'll need to think through the active-active-active setup and how the VRIDs would be distributed.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. The key is that with active-active-active, each device needs its own VRID, so the answer is 3 VRIDs.
JE
Jerry
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Journal entries, which include debits and credits, are used to update the accounting records, including the equity account. The question is asking about the specific components used to increase or decrease equity.
EZ
Ezekiel
1 year ago
I feel like I saw something about automation in our notes, but I'm not convinced that's the core of architecture transformation. Could it really be D?
DE
Denna
1 year ago
UPS is definitely the way to go here. It's designed to provide backup power during electrical instability.
NE
Nelida
1 year ago
Haha, this question is like a VRRP maze. I'm just going to roll the dice and pick F. 4 VRIDs, that's my final answer!
FR
France
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with the original comment, F) 4 VRIDs seems like the right choice.
MA
Marget
1 year ago
User 2: I'm going with A) 2 VRIDs.
PE
Peggie
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is actually C) 6 VRIDs.
SH
Shaniqua
1 year ago
Wait, what? Active-Active-Active? Is this some kind of VRRP Inception? I'm going with B. The default VRID should be enough, right?
CO
Corinne
1 year ago
Yeah, B makes sense. Let's keep it simple with the default VRID.
GE
Gearldine
1 year ago
I agree, let's go with B. It seems like the most logical option.
FI
Filiberto
1 year ago
I think B is the right choice. The default VRID should work.
KI
Kindra
1 year ago
Nah, 6 VRIDs is overkill. I'm going with D. 5 VRIDs should be enough to distribute the load correctly.
TI
Tiara
1 year ago
Yeah, D seems like the most reasonable choice for distributing the load.
SH
Shawana
1 year ago
I think 6 VRIDs would be too much, D is the way to go.
WY
Wynell
1 year ago
I agree, 5 VRIDs should be sufficient for the deployment.
GR
Gregoria
1 year ago
I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't we need 6 VRIDs to cover all the possible failover scenarios? C seems like the right answer to me.
SH
Shonda
1 year ago
Hmm, I think the answer is E. 3 VRIDs would be required to handle the failover scenario as described.
LA
Latia
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be F. 4 VRIDs could be necessary for this setup.
MA
Marya
1 year ago
I disagree, I think the answer is C. 6 VRIDs would be needed for this type of deployment.
MA
Mauricio
1 year ago
No, I believe the answer is A. 2 VRIDs are enough for the deployment.
MY
Myra
1 year ago
I think the answer is E. 3 VRIDs would be required to handle the failover scenario as described.
ED
Edelmira
1 year ago
That's a good point, but I still think having separate VRIDs for each device would ensure better load distribution in case of failover.
KA
Karl
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) 2 because we only need two VRIDs for the three-device deployment.
ED
Edelmira
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) 6 because we need a separate VRID for each device in the Active-Active-Active setup.