Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

XML Exam I10-003 Topic 5 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for XML's I10-003 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 5
[All I10-003 Questions]

Consider the execution of [XQuery] as referenced in a separate window.

Assume that the following index is used when executing this [XQuery] on a certain XMLDB.

[Index Usage Standards] (assumed)

Use only the most efficient index when an index for both $A/@type and $B/@type is created.

If only one index is created, use that index.

Do not use an index if none is created.

Assume the following circumstances regarding the statistical values related to the execution of this [XQuery].

[Statistical Value] (assumed)

When creating an index for $A/@type, the response time when updating $A/@type data is one millisecond longeron average.

When creating an index for $B/@type. the response time when updating $B/@type data is one millisecond longeron average.

When creating an index for either $A/@type or$B/@type, or when creating an index for both, the response time of [XQuery] execution is at least two milliseconds shorter on average.

Of all of the values of $A/@type, the rate of inclusion of identical values is 1% on average. Of all of the values of $B/@type, the rate of inclusion of identical values is 2% on average. The ratio of $A/@type data update, $B/@type data update, and [XQuery] execution is 1:1:1 on average.

When the number of data items for both $A/@type and $B/@type are extremely large and almost identical, which is the most effective method for improving overall execution efficiency? Assume that this XMLDB has no other automated optimization functions than those described above. Assume that no other queries are executed.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Andra
1 months ago
Option D all the way! Why wouldn't you want to have both indexes? It's like having a backup plan for your backup plan. And hey, at least it's not as bad as the time I tried to index my sock drawer, right?
upvoted 0 times
Matt
13 days ago
Exactly! It's better to be safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
23 days ago
Option D all the way! Why wouldn't you want to have both indexes?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desmond
2 months ago
Hold up, did they really say the data for $A/@type and $B/@type is 'extremely large and almost identical'? That's a pretty strange assumption. I'm going with option D, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Willard
20 days ago
Yeah, I think it's better to go with creating an index for both $A/@type and $B/@type just to improve overall efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
22 days ago
I agree, that assumption does seem odd. But I think option D is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melynda
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. The low rate of identical values for both $A/@type and $B/@type data makes me think that creating an index for just one of them might be a better choice. Decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
2 months ago
That's a good point, but considering the overall execution efficiency, creating an index for both might still be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
2 months ago
Well, this is a tricky one. Given the statistics provided, it seems like creating an index for both $A/@type and $B/@type would be the most efficient option. The response time improvement for the [XQuery] execution is the key factor here.
upvoted 0 times
Brynn
13 days ago
Definitely, creating an index for both variables seems to be the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 months ago
I agree, it's all about optimizing the overall execution efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 months ago
Yeah, the response time improvement for the [XQuery] execution makes it the most effective method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
1 months ago
Creating an index for both $A/@type and $B/@type is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe creating an index for $B/@type would be better since the rate of inclusion of identical values is higher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
2 months ago
I think creating an index for both $A/@type and $B/@type would be the most effective method.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel