Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

XML I10-002 Exam - Topic 5 Question 99 Discussion

Posted by Naomi on Jan 05, 2026 at 05:16 AM

Which of the following correctly describes the results of normalizing the following XML Document rec element by Exclusive XML Canonicalization?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium I10-002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
JA
Jacklyn 6 months ago
D is too minimal. I prefer A for clarity.
AR
Arlette 6 months ago
C seems correct to me. It shows all namespaces clearly.
DI
Diane 6 months ago
I feel like B is more straightforward. Less clutter.
AM
Amber 6 months ago
I think the answer is A. It keeps both namespaces.
PE
Peggy 6 months ago
C is also valid, but A is definitely the best choice here.
NA
Nada 6 months ago
Wait, why does A have both namespaces? Seems odd.
LI
Lindsey 7 months ago
I thought B would be right since it looks simpler.
LE
Lettie 7 months ago
Totally agree with A! Makes sense.
SH
Shawnna 7 months ago
A) is the correct answer. It keeps both namespaces.
EL
Eladia 7 months ago
I'm just glad I don't have to remember all these XML canonicalization rules. I'll stick to HTML, where the only rule is "make it look pretty."
TY
Tyisha 7 months ago
Option D is also a valid answer, but B is more precise and follows the canonicalization rules better.
EV
Evette 8 months ago
Exclusive XML Canonicalization is like a magic wand for XML documents - it makes the unnecessary stuff disappear!
LA
Lajuana 8 months ago
I agree with Carin. Option B is the cleanest and most concise representation of the normalized XML document.
CA
Carin 8 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. The Exclusive XML Canonicalization process removes any unnecessary namespace declarations.
SA
Salome 9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the differences in the options. I feel like D could also be a candidate since it looks simpler, but I can't recall the exact rules.
PA
Pamella 9 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I think the answer might be A because it keeps both namespaces, which seems right for normalization.
ST
Stephaine 9 months ago
I think it might be option B since it has fewer namespaces, but I need to double-check the rules about default namespaces.
CE
Ceola 9 months ago
I remember that Exclusive XML Canonicalization removes unused namespaces, but I'm not sure which option that applies to here.
TE
Teri 9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to double-check my understanding of the Exclusive XML Canonicalization algorithm to make sure I'm not missing anything.
FR
France 9 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I've reviewed the Exclusive XML Canonicalization spec, and I believe the correct answer is option D.
LO
Lorean 10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to identify which namespace declarations are necessary and which are redundant based on the Exclusive XML Canonicalization rules.
CH
Chuck 10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different namespace declarations in the options. I'll need to think through how that affects the canonicalization process.
DE
Dexter 10 months ago
This looks like a tricky XML canonicalization question. I'll need to carefully review the rules for Exclusive XML Canonicalization to determine the correct answer.
BI
Billi 4 months ago
↳ replying to Dexter
I feel like D might be the right choice. It looks cleaner.
RA
Raelene 4 months ago
↳ replying to Dexter
Same here! I’m leaning towards option A, but not sure.
CE
Cecil 5 months ago
↳ replying to Dexter
This is definitely tricky! I think I need to brush up on my XML rules.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel