Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

XML I10-002 Exam - Topic 5 Question 99 Discussion

Which of the following correctly describes the results of normalizing the following XML Document rec element by Exclusive XML Canonicalization?
B) <b:rec xmlns:b='urn:xmlmaster:b'> <b:field></b:field> </b:rec>
A) <b:rec xmlns:a='urn:xmlmaster:a' xmlns:b='urn:xmlmaster:b'> <b:field></b:field> </b:rec>
C) <b:rec xmlns:a='urn:xmlmaster:a' xmlns:b='urn:xmlmaster:b'><b:field></b:field></b:rec>
D) <b:rec xmlns:b='urn:xmlmaster:b'><b:field></b:field></b:rec>

XML I10-002 Exam - Topic 5 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for XML's I10-002 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 5
[All I10-002 Questions]

Which of the following correctly describes the results of normalizing the following XML Document rec element by Exclusive XML Canonicalization?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Naomi at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium I10-002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jacklyn
1 month ago
D is too minimal. I prefer A for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 month ago
C seems correct to me. It shows all namespaces clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
1 month ago
I feel like B is more straightforward. Less clutter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 months ago
I think the answer is A. It keeps both namespaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
2 months ago
C is also valid, but A is definitely the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
2 months ago
Wait, why does A have both namespaces? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 months ago
I thought B would be right since it looks simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 months ago
Totally agree with A! Makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
2 months ago
A) is the correct answer. It keeps both namespaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
3 months ago
I'm just glad I don't have to remember all these XML canonicalization rules. I'll stick to HTML, where the only rule is "make it look pretty."
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
3 months ago
Option D is also a valid answer, but B is more precise and follows the canonicalization rules better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
3 months ago
Exclusive XML Canonicalization is like a magic wand for XML documents - it makes the unnecessary stuff disappear!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
4 months ago
I agree with Carin. Option B is the cleanest and most concise representation of the normalized XML document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
4 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. The Exclusive XML Canonicalization process removes any unnecessary namespace declarations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the differences in the options. I feel like D could also be a candidate since it looks simpler, but I can't recall the exact rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I think the answer might be A because it keeps both namespaces, which seems right for normalization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
I think it might be option B since it has fewer namespaces, but I need to double-check the rules about default namespaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
5 months ago
I remember that Exclusive XML Canonicalization removes unused namespaces, but I'm not sure which option that applies to here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to double-check my understanding of the Exclusive XML Canonicalization algorithm to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I've reviewed the Exclusive XML Canonicalization spec, and I believe the correct answer is option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to identify which namespace declarations are necessary and which are redundant based on the Exclusive XML Canonicalization rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different namespace declarations in the options. I'll need to think through how that affects the canonicalization process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky XML canonicalization question. I'll need to carefully review the rules for Exclusive XML Canonicalization to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Cecil
26 days ago
This is definitely tricky! I think I need to brush up on my XML rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel