MENU
Which of the following does not correctly describe the merits of adopting a standard language such as XBRL or NewsML when transmitting XML data between two different companies?
Suggested Answer: E
Get Premium I10-002 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
EL
Elin
11 months ago
Totally agree with A, standardization simplifies everything!
LI
Lizbeth
11 months ago
Wait, D sounds too good to be true, can we really skip performance tuning?
PR
Princess
11 months ago
B makes sense, comparing costs is key for businesses.
CR
Crissy
12 months ago
I disagree, C isn't always easy, linking systems can be tricky.
PO
Portia
12 months ago
A is definitely true, standard languages help with agreement.
LI
Lillian
12 months ago
I vaguely recall that option B might be about cost comparisons, but I can't quite connect it to the merits of using a standard language.
BE
Bettina
1 year ago
This question reminds me of a practice one we did about the benefits of standardization. I feel like option C could be misleading since linking systems isn't always straightforward.
AL
Alton
1 year ago
I think option D sounds off because even with a standard, performance tuning might still be necessary, right?
TE
Teri
1 year ago
I remember discussing how standard languages like XBRL can simplify data exchange, but I'm not sure if it's really easy to agree on the format.
CH
Chaya
1 year ago
The key here is identifying which option does not correctly describe the merits. The first three seem like valid benefits, but that last one about performance tuning is throwing me off. I'm leaning towards D, but I'll double-check my reasoning before submitting.
YU
Yuette
1 year ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. The options are all talking about different aspects of using a standard language. I'm not sure which one is the "incorrect" description. I'll need to re-read this a few times to make sure I understand what they're asking.
MA
Marta
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The last option is the only one that doesn't correctly describe the merits of using a standard language. The others all seem like valid benefits. I'll go with D.
JA
Jamal
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the merits of adopting a standard language like XBRL or NewsML. I'll need to carefully read through the options.
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
Hmm, the last option about performance tuning seems like the odd one out. I'm pretty confident that's the correct answer, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
MA
Malcom
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The fact that Client1 and Client2 are connected to both RR1 and RR2 makes me think there might be some redundant entries. I'll need to work through it step-by-step.
EV
Eveline
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the Cisco Unified Contact Center Installer, so I'll need to think this through carefully.
AL
Alyce
1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. Based on my understanding of business analysis, I believe the BA would determine the formality of the assessment process based on the overall business analysis approach, not just governance or change strategy alone. I'll go with that.
JE
Jettie
1 year ago
Haha, option D is the winner! 'No need to consider performance'? That's like saying 'just let the hamsters run the server, it'll be fine.'
ER
Erick
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, performance tuning is always important in system development.
ST
Stephen
1 year ago
User 2: I know right, 'no need to consider performance' sounds risky.
SH
Shaun
1 year ago
User 1: Haha, option D is the winner!
ES
Essie
1 year ago
Okay, this is easy. Option D is clearly the answer. It's like saying 'just slap it together, it'll be fine.' That's not how the real world works, folks.
TA
Tayna
1 year ago
Ah, I see what they're going for. Option D is the only one that doesn't make sense. 'No need to consider performance'? Yeah, right, and unicorns are real.
JA
Jacquline
2 years ago
Hmm, I think option D is the odd one out here. Performance tuning? In a standard language? That's like putting a turbocharger on a bicycle.
LA
Lacey
1 year ago
User1: That's true, having a standard language can definitely help with communication.
TY
Ty
1 year ago
User3: I think option A makes more sense. Easy agreement on XML format sounds important.
QU
Quiana
1 year ago
User2: Yeah, it's strange. Maybe they meant something else.
LA
Lajuana
1 year ago
User1: I agree, option D doesn't make sense. Why would performance tuning not be needed?
OM
Omer
2 years ago
But D makes sense because performance tuning is already taken care of in the language design.
EL
Elouise
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
OM
Omer
2 years ago
I think the answer is D.
KI
Kimi
2 years ago
Wait, so we're supposed to choose the option that doesn't describe the merits? That's like asking me to pick the least tasty chocolate from a box of truffles.
RO
Robt
1 year ago
D) Since the language design has already placed a premium on performance, there will be no need to consider performance tuning during system development
CH
Chery
1 year ago
C) Once a system is developed, it is easy to use to link to a different system of another company
SH
Shawana
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that option doesn't really describe the merits of adopting a standard language like XBRL or NewsML
HI
Hildegarde
1 year ago
B) If there is an application package product available, a cost comparison can be made between purchasing the package or developing the application in-house to make the most cost-effective selection
NO
Noah
1 year ago
User 1: A) It is easy to achieve agreement as to the XML format to be used for transmission between the developers of the linked system
SU
Susy
1 year ago
A) It is easy to achieve agreement as to the XML format to be used for transmission between the developers of the linked system