Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

XML Exam I10-002 Topic 2 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for XML's I10-002 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 2
[All I10-002 Questions]

Which of the following does not correctly describe the merits of adopting a standard language such as XBRL or NewsML when transmitting XML data between two different companies?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

by France at Feb 09, 2024, 06:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium I10-002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jettie
1 months ago
Haha, option D is the winner! 'No need to consider performance'? That's like saying 'just let the hamsters run the server, it'll be fine.'
upvoted 0 times
Erick
4 days ago
User 3: Definitely, performance tuning is always important in system development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
16 days ago
User 2: I know right, 'no need to consider performance' sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
21 days ago
User 1: Haha, option D is the winner!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Essie
1 months ago
Okay, this is easy. Option D is clearly the answer. It's like saying 'just slap it together, it'll be fine.' That's not how the real world works, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
1 months ago
Ah, I see what they're going for. Option D is the only one that doesn't make sense. 'No need to consider performance'? Yeah, right, and unicorns are real.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
1 months ago
Hmm, I think option D is the odd one out here. Performance tuning? In a standard language? That's like putting a turbocharger on a bicycle.
upvoted 0 times
Lacey
4 days ago
User1: That's true, having a standard language can definitely help with communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
9 days ago
User3: I think option A makes more sense. Easy agreement on XML format sounds important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
10 days ago
User2: Yeah, it's strange. Maybe they meant something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
20 days ago
User1: I agree, option D doesn't make sense. Why would performance tuning not be needed?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Omer
2 months ago
But D makes sense because performance tuning is already taken care of in the language design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
2 months ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
2 months ago
Wait, so we're supposed to choose the option that doesn't describe the merits? That's like asking me to pick the least tasty chocolate from a box of truffles.
upvoted 0 times
Robt
14 days ago
D) Since the language design has already placed a premium on performance, there will be no need to consider performance tuning during system development
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
19 days ago
C) Once a system is developed, it is easy to use to link to a different system of another company
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
19 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that option doesn't really describe the merits of adopting a standard language like XBRL or NewsML
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
23 days ago
B) If there is an application package product available, a cost comparison can be made between purchasing the package or developing the application in-house to make the most cost-effective selection
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
30 days ago
User 1: A) It is easy to achieve agreement as to the XML format to be used for transmission between the developers of the linked system
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
1 months ago
A) It is easy to achieve agreement as to the XML format to be used for transmission between the developers of the linked system
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel