I think the correct answer is C. The whole point of a CDATA section is to allow you to include literal text, including characters like '<' and '&', without the XML parser trying to interpret them as markup. I'm pretty confident about that.
Wait, I'm confused. Isn't a CDATA section used to include text that shouldn't be parsed as XML? I'm not sure if that means you can just use any characters or if there are still some rules. I'll have to review my notes on this.
Okay, I remember learning about CDATA sections in class. I believe the key is that they allow you to include special characters without the XML parser interpreting them. So C seems like the right answer here.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I think the CDATA section is meant to avoid XML parsing, but I'm not sure if that means the characters can be used without any changes. I'll have to think this through carefully.
Hmm, I was a bit confused by the wording of option B. Can you really use different encodings within a CDATA section? Seems like it would just be a mess!
Edgar
2 months agoZoila
3 months agoTequila
3 months agoNohemi
3 months agoGoldie
3 months agoMelina
3 months agoLouisa
4 months agoRoosevelt
4 months agoPearline
4 months agoSang
4 months agoVanna
5 months agoHoa
5 months agoChristoper
5 months agoElenore
5 months agoDenae
10 months agoAntione
9 months agoDorothea
9 months agoTruman
10 months agoRupert
10 months agoLaurel
10 months agoAlease
10 months agoVenita
9 months agoJeff
9 months agoJunita
9 months agoLeigha
9 months agoBernadine
9 months agoDyan
9 months agoWinifred
9 months agoLavonna
10 months agoDyan
11 months agoClement
11 months agoLatanya
11 months ago