Select which of the following correctly presents a combination of an XML Schema restriction and a related definition. Assume the Schema namespace prefix is "xs".
Suggested Answer: A, C
Get Premium I10-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
14 comments · newest first
HA
Haley
4 days ago
B) is the only one that makes sense with decimal restrictions!
WA
Wayne
9 days ago
Wait, how can D) allow "PFG-TF3/SP" but not "PFG-TF3"? Seems off.
DE
Desmond
14 days ago
C) looks good, "PFG-TF3/SP" is included in the enumeration.
CH
Charolette
19 days ago
I think B) is correct, decimals can have fraction digits!
SH
Shannon
24 days ago
A) is definitely wrong, it says 125.55 is valid but the max is 150.
LU
Lucia
30 days ago
Totally agree with A, that restriction makes sense!
PO
Portia
1 month ago
Wait, how can D) allow "PFG-TF3/SP" but not "PFG-TF3"? Seems weird.
RE
Remona
1 month ago
C) is correct, "PFG-TF3/SP" is valid, but "PFG-TF3" isn't.
OD
Odelia
2 months ago
B) seems off, 15000.127 doesn't fit the decimal restriction.
VI
Vicente
2 months ago
A) has a maxExclusive of 150, so 170 is definitely out.
ST
Stevie
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because it mentions minLength, which makes sense for a product code. But I’m not entirely sure if it’s the best choice given the context.
TW
Twila
2 months ago
I thought that for decimal types, the fractionDigits restriction would limit the number of decimal places. So, option B seems a bit confusing to me.
EL
Ellsworth
2 months ago
I feel like I practiced a question similar to option C, where enumerations were involved. But I’m not sure if the values listed are correct for the restriction.
BO
Bok
2 months ago
I remember that for price types, the restrictions should really focus on the correct data type, like float or decimal. I think option A might be off since it says 125.55 is valid but the max is 150.