MENU
A global organization uses a "balanced scorecard" approach for global performance management. What is one potential advantage of this approach in a multinational context?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium GR7 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
JA
Jacklyn
2 months ago
A is too rigid. We need to adapt to different regions.
PE
Peter
2 months ago
Agreed, B allows flexibility while aligning goals.
AN
Annice
3 months ago
I think B is the best choice. It respects local cultures.
LO
Louann
3 months ago
B really captures the essence of balancing local and global goals.
TA
Tawna
3 months ago
C is too limiting; we need more than just financials.
MI
Micaela
3 months ago
Surprised that people think A is a good idea!
MI
Mitzie
3 months ago
I disagree, A seems more straightforward.
LE
Leanora
3 months ago
B is definitely the best choice!
LO
Lou
4 months ago
I definitely recall that limiting evaluations to just financial metrics is a bad idea, so I don’t think option C is correct.
PO
Portia
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused because I thought standardizing goals could be beneficial, but it might not work well in diverse cultures.
AU
Audria
4 months ago
I remember a practice question about performance management that emphasized the importance of aligning regional goals with the overall strategy. So, I’m leaning towards option B.
AL
Alisha
4 months ago
I think the balanced scorecard helps align goals, but I'm not sure if it really accommodates cultural differences as well as it should.