MENU
When would the paired-comparison approach be preferred over the simple ranking approach?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium C2 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
25 comments · newest first
CH
Chantell
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure about this? Sounds too complicated!
RU
Ruth
10 months ago
D seems a bit off, can’t you just research job content?
CL
Clare
10 months ago
C makes sense if ranking gets too expensive.
AN
Annabelle
11 months ago
I think B is more important for accurate data.
JU
Julene
11 months ago
Definitely A! More jobs mean more comparisons.
EL
Elvis
11 months ago
I thought simple ranking was always easier, but maybe paired-comparison is better when costs get too high? That sounds familiar.
WI
Willetta
12 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I feel like paired-comparison is useful when there's not enough info on job content.
SH
Shantell
12 months ago
I remember something about needing accurate market data, but I can't recall if that specifically relates to paired-comparison.
VI
Viola
1 year ago
I think the paired-comparison approach might be better when we have a lot of jobs to evaluate, but I'm not entirely sure.
LE
Leonie
1 year ago
The key seems to be the level of job information available. If there's insufficient info on job content, then paired-comparison might be preferred over simple ranking, which relies more on that detailed job data. I'll make sure to keep that in mind.
TH
Thomasena
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The paired-comparison approach would be better when you have a larger number of jobs to evaluate, as it can provide more accurate market data compared to simple ranking. The cost factor is also important - if simple ranking becomes too costly, paired-comparison may be the way to go.
SV
Svetlana
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the nuances here. I know paired-comparison involves directly comparing each job, but I'm not sure how that differs from simple ranking in terms of when it would be preferred.
CY
Cyndy
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about when to use paired-comparison over simple ranking. I'll need to think through the key differences between the two approaches.
NO
Nobuko
1 year ago
But what about when there is a need for accurate market data?
RH
Rhea
1 year ago
I agree with Xuan. It allows for a more systematic comparison.
IS
Isaac
1 year ago
Option D, for sure. When you're lacking job content info, paired-comparison is the way to go to get a clear picture.
XU
Xuan
1 year ago
I think the paired-comparison approach would be preferred when evaluating a larger number of jobs.
TI
Timmy
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I feel like option C makes the most sense - simple ranking can get pricey, so paired-comparison is the way to save some cash.
LI
Linsey
10 months ago
True, but option B is important for accurate data.
FR
Freeman
10 months ago
I think option A is also a good choice. More jobs mean more comparisons.
MA
Makeda
11 months ago
Option D makes sense too. Sometimes we just don't have enough info.
SH
Shelton
11 months ago
I agree with you, Linsey. Accurate market data is crucial.
AR
Aron
1 year ago
I think option A is the way to go. Paired-comparison is perfect for larger job evaluations, you know?
AA
Aaron
1 year ago
Yeah, paired-comparison approach is more efficient when dealing with a lot of job evaluations.
SL
Slyvia
1 year ago
I agree, option A is definitely the best choice for evaluating a larger number of jobs.