Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Workday-Pro-Compensation Exam - Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Workday's Workday-Pro-Compensation exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 1
[All Workday-Pro-Compensation Questions]

You created a new one-time payment plan and enabled employees to request payments for themselves. While testing, you notice that an existing custom validation for the Request One-Time Payment process also applies to the Request One-Time Payment for Self process.

How can you ensure these validations do not run for employees requesting one-time payments for themselves?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Maintain Custom Validations allows you to refine which events validations apply to.

Workday distinguishes between Request One-Time Payment (manager/HR initiated) and Request One-Time Payment for Self (employee initiated).

By using the One Time Payment Event for Self field, you can exclude self-service events from being validated by the existing custom validations.

Why not the others?

B . Add new validations Would duplicate rules rather than exclude them.

C . Remove Employee as Self from security domain Would block employees from submitting requests, not exclude validations.

D . Configure Options Fields Controls fields displayed, not validation logic.


Workday Pro Compensation -- Custom Validations Guide: Validations can be scoped to specific business processes, including 'for self' variants.

Workday Community -- One-Time Payment Event for Self Validation Handling.

by Starr at Mar 08, 2026, 11:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Workday-Pro-Compensation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rupert
15 days ago
Wait, can we really just exclude those validations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
20 days ago
C) could cause more issues down the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
25 days ago
I disagree, B) might be better for future changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
1 month ago
A) seems like the easiest fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
1 month ago
I’m not sure about option C; removing Employee as Self from the security domain seems risky and could affect other processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 month ago
I’m leaning towards option D because it seems like a straightforward way to prevent those validations from triggering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
2 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like adding new validations, like in option B, might complicate things unnecessarily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
2 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it will completely exclude the validations for self-requested payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
I recall we discussed Configure Options Fields in class, so option D could be a valid approach to exclude the triggering fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
2 months ago
I feel like option C might be too drastic. Removing Employee as Self from the security domain could have other implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about adding new validations in similar practice questions. Maybe option B is the way to go?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
2 months ago
I think option A makes sense since it mentions using the One Time Payment Event for Self field to exclude those validations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel