Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Workday-Pro-Compensation Exam - Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Posted by Starr on Mar 08, 2026 at 11:11 PM

You created a new one-time payment plan and enabled employees to request payments for themselves. While testing, you notice that an existing custom validation for the Request One-Time Payment process also applies to the Request One-Time Payment for Self process.

How can you ensure these validations do not run for employees requesting one-time payments for themselves?

Suggested Answer: A

Maintain Custom Validations allows you to refine which events validations apply to.

Workday distinguishes between Request One-Time Payment (manager/HR initiated) and Request One-Time Payment for Self (employee initiated).

By using the One Time Payment Event for Self field, you can exclude self-service events from being validated by the existing custom validations.

Why not the others?

B . Add new validations Would duplicate rules rather than exclude them.

C . Remove Employee as Self from security domain Would block employees from submitting requests, not exclude validations.

D . Configure Options Fields Controls fields displayed, not validation logic.


Workday Pro Compensation -- Custom Validations Guide: Validations can be scoped to specific business processes, including 'for self' variants.

Workday Community -- One-Time Payment Event for Self Validation Handling.

Get Premium Workday-Pro-Compensation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
KI
Kindra 2 days ago
I prefer option B. It adds specific validations.
MI
Micaela 7 days ago
I think option A is the best choice.
LU
Luisa 12 days ago
D could work, but it might complicate things.
SH
Shaquana 17 days ago
Option C seems too drastic. We need flexibility.
SH
Sherman 23 days ago
I prefer option B. It adds specific validations.
HE
Henriette 28 days ago
I think option A is the best choice.
RA
Raina 1 month ago
D could work, but it might complicate things.
FA
Fallon 1 month ago
Option C seems too drastic. We need flexibility.
RA
Raelene 1 month ago
I prefer option B. It adds specific validations.
LI
Lisandra 2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
RE
Ressie 2 months ago
I think A) is the simplest solution here.
TY
Tyra 2 months ago
D) might complicate things more than necessary.
JU
Junita 2 months ago
Wait, can we really just remove Employee as Self? Sounds risky.
VI
Vilma 2 months ago
I disagree, B) could work better for specific cases.
AL
Alyce 2 months ago
A) seems like the best option to me.
LI
Lilli 3 months ago
D) sounds like a workaround, but is it reliable?
FR
Freida 3 months ago
Wait, can we really just exclude those validations?
FI
Fidelia 3 months ago
C) might be too restrictive for some cases.
DI
Dick 3 months ago
I think B) could complicate things more.
JA
Jarod 3 months ago
A) seems like the easiest fix.
LA
Latanya 4 months ago
D) sounds like a solid workaround too!
RU
Rupert 5 months ago
Wait, can we really just exclude those validations?
RO
Rozella 5 months ago
C) could cause more issues down the line.
PA
Paulina 5 months ago
I disagree, B) might be better for future changes.
RO
Ronald 6 months ago
A) seems like the easiest fix.
MY
Myrtie 6 months ago
I’m not sure about option C; removing Employee as Self from the security domain seems risky and could affect other processes.
YO
Yoko 6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because it seems like a straightforward way to prevent those validations from triggering.
JO
Jonell 6 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like adding new validations, like in option B, might complicate things unnecessarily.
TW
Twila 6 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it will completely exclude the validations for self-requested payments.
DA
Dalene 6 months ago
I recall we discussed Configure Options Fields in class, so option D could be a valid approach to exclude the triggering fields.
NA
Naomi 7 months ago
I feel like option C might be too drastic. Removing Employee as Self from the security domain could have other implications.
KI
Kimbery 7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about adding new validations in similar practice questions. Maybe option B is the way to go?
HE
Helga 7 months ago
I think option A makes sense since it mentions using the One Time Payment Event for Self field to exclude those validations.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel