Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Workday Pro Benefits Exam - Topic 5 Question 9 Discussion

Posted by Kenny on Jun 20, 2026 at 10:08 PM

All full-time employees are in one benefit group. Employees need more than twenty years of service to enroll in a medical benefit plan available in this benefit group. How will you accomplish this without creating a new benefit group?

Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is A because Workday allows administrators to keep a broad worker population in a single benefit group while restricting access to a specific plan through a Benefit Plan Eligibility Rule. In this case, all full-time employees belong to one benefit group, but only those with more than twenty years of service should be allowed to enroll in the medical plan. The correct design is to assign the plan to the existing benefit group and then attach a worker-based eligibility rule on the plan itself using the Worker Plan Eligibility field.

This approach avoids unnecessary creation of another benefit group and keeps the overall benefits structure simpler and easier to maintain. Option B is incorrect because manual communication and intervention are not proper configuration controls for eligibility. Option C is also incorrect because Provider ID is not intended to manage service-based plan eligibility. Option D is not appropriate because launching a separate enrollment just for one eligibility condition creates administrative complexity and does not solve the configuration requirement cleanly. Plan-level eligibility rules are the standard Workday method for handling this scenario.


Get Premium Workday Pro Benefits Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
18 comments · newest first
AV
Avery 17 days ago
Good point. A covers all bases.
JO
Joni 23 days ago
But what if they miss the notification in B?
CO
Cornell 28 days ago
Exactly! Rules help avoid misunderstandings.
AV
Avery 1 month ago
A is more proactive. We need clear rules.
JO
Joni 1 month ago
B keeps it straightforward. Just reach out to benefits.
CO
Cornell 1 month ago
True, but A ensures everyone knows the eligibility.
AV
Avery 2 months ago
Option D could confuse people. Separate enrollment?
JO
Joni 2 months ago
I agree, but B seems easier to manage. Just a notification.
CO
Cornell 2 months ago
I think option A is the best. Simple and clear.
JU
Julian 2 months ago
D is just going to confuse everyone, right?
MA
Ma 2 months ago
C sounds a bit complicated for employees.
ME
Melina 2 months ago
Wait, why not just create a new benefit group?
TW
Twila 3 months ago
I think B is a better choice. Communication is key!
CY
Cyril 3 months ago
Option A seems the most straightforward.
AL
Alease 3 months ago
Option C sounds a bit off to me. I don't recall using provider IDs for eligibility like this in our studies.
KR
Kristel 3 months ago
I remember a practice question similar to this, and I think we discussed that option D could complicate things with a separate enrollment period.
TR
Tracie 3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but option B seems like it could work too. It might just create extra steps for employees, though.
AD
Adela 4 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense since it directly ties the eligibility rule to the years of service without needing a new group.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel