Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Workday Pro Benefits Exam - Topic 5 Question 1 Discussion

Posted by Ria on May 06, 2026 at 02:37 AM

A consultant is working with a client to set up maximum coverage limits between two insurance plans. The client wants the Spousal Life coverage to be no more than 50% of the employee's Voluntary Supplemental Life coverage. How will the consultant implement this?

Suggested Answer: D

The correct answer is D because Workday provides cross plan insurance rules specifically to control relationships between elections across multiple insurance plans. When one plan's maximum coverage must be calculated as a percentage of another plan's election, the correct configuration is a cross plan insurance percentage maximum. In this case, the Spousal Life plan must be capped at 50% of the employee's Voluntary Supplemental Life election, so the system needs a rule that compares the two plans and enforces that percentage-based limit during enrollment.

Option A is incorrect because an eligibility rule determines whether a worker can enroll in a plan, not how one insurance election is mathematically limited by another. Option B is also incorrect because business process validations are not the standard configuration method for enforcing insurance coverage relationships during benefit elections. Option C does not solve the requirement either, since a prerequisite can require another election but does not impose a percentage-based maximum. To enforce dependent insurance coverage limits tied to an employee's elected amount, Workday uses a cross plan insurance percentage maximum, making D the correct configuration choice.


Get Premium Workday Pro Benefits Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
24 comments · newest first
AR
Arlette 2 days ago
Exactly, no confusion with A.
JU
Julieta 7 days ago
I feel like A is the simplest solution.
JU
Jules 12 days ago
B ensures compliance every time.
HA
Han 18 days ago
A is straightforward and clear.
SA
Samira 23 days ago
D could work too, but it's complex.
JU
Julieta 28 days ago
C seems unnecessary.
JU
Jules 1 month ago
I prefer B. It validates during the process.
AR
Arlette 1 month ago
It directly limits the Spousal Life coverage.
HA
Han 1 month ago
Why A?
AR
Arlette 2 months ago
I think A is the best choice.
SA
Samira 2 months ago
This question is tricky.
TA
Tanja 2 months ago
Wait, can they really limit spousal coverage like that?
TA
Tammara 2 months ago
Option D seems like the best way to enforce that limit.
CA
Carmen 2 months ago
Isn't 50% a bit low for spousal coverage?
LE
Leota 2 months ago
Definitely agree with option B!
LE
Lenna 3 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense.
BE
Bernardo 3 months ago
Option D seems like it could be the best choice because it specifically mentions creating a maximum limit for Spousal Life coverage.
LA
Lashawna 3 months ago
I practiced a question about cross plan prerequisites before, but I don't think option C fits this scenario since it doesn't directly limit the coverage amount.
SO
Sonia 3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about validation processes in similar questions. Maybe option B could work too?
DO
Dominga 3 months ago
I think option A sounds right since it mentions adding an eligibility rule, which seems like a direct way to enforce the coverage limit.
IL
Iluminada 4 months ago
Adding a validation to the business process seems like it could work, but I wonder if that would be enough to enforce the limit effectively.
GR
Gracie 5 months ago
I feel like the cross plan insurance percentage maximum could be a solid choice, but I need to double-check how that would work in practice.
DE
Denae 5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to set limits on coverage, but I can't recall if it was about eligibility or validation.
EL
Elenora 5 months ago
I think the eligibility rule option sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best approach for this situation.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel