Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Workday Pro Benefits Exam - Topic 5 Question 1 Discussion

A consultant is working with a client to set up maximum coverage limits between two insurance plans. The client wants the Spousal Life coverage to be no more than 50% of the employee's Voluntary Supplemental Life coverage. How will the consultant implement this?
D) Create a cross plan insurance percentage maximum to limit Spousal Life coverage to 50% of Voluntary Supplemental Life.
A) Add an eligibility rule to the Spousal Life plan to limit coverage to 50% of the employee's Voluntary Supplemental Life coverage.
B) Add a validation to the change benefits business process to limit Spousal Life coverage to 50% of Voluntary Supplemental Life.
C) Create a cross plan enrollment prerequisite to ensure the employee selects the same coverage target for both insurance plans.

Workday Pro Benefits Exam - Topic 5 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Workday's Workday Pro Benefits exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 5
[All Workday Pro Benefits Questions]

A consultant is working with a client to set up maximum coverage limits between two insurance plans. The client wants the Spousal Life coverage to be no more than 50% of the employee's Voluntary Supplemental Life coverage. How will the consultant implement this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The correct answer is D because Workday provides cross plan insurance rules specifically to control relationships between elections across multiple insurance plans. When one plan's maximum coverage must be calculated as a percentage of another plan's election, the correct configuration is a cross plan insurance percentage maximum. In this case, the Spousal Life plan must be capped at 50% of the employee's Voluntary Supplemental Life election, so the system needs a rule that compares the two plans and enforces that percentage-based limit during enrollment.

Option A is incorrect because an eligibility rule determines whether a worker can enroll in a plan, not how one insurance election is mathematically limited by another. Option B is also incorrect because business process validations are not the standard configuration method for enforcing insurance coverage relationships during benefit elections. Option C does not solve the requirement either, since a prerequisite can require another election but does not impose a percentage-based maximum. To enforce dependent insurance coverage limits tied to an employee's elected amount, Workday uses a cross plan insurance percentage maximum, making D the correct configuration choice.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lashawna
2 hours ago
I practiced a question about cross plan prerequisites before, but I don't think option C fits this scenario since it doesn't directly limit the coverage amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
5 days ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about validation processes in similar questions. Maybe option B could work too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
10 days ago
I think option A sounds right since it mentions adding an eligibility rule, which seems like a direct way to enforce the coverage limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
16 days ago
Adding a validation to the business process seems like it could work, but I wonder if that would be enough to enforce the limit effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
2 months ago
I feel like the cross plan insurance percentage maximum could be a solid choice, but I need to double-check how that would work in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
2 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to set limits on coverage, but I can't recall if it was about eligibility or validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
2 months ago
I think the eligibility rule option sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best approach for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel