Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Workday Prism Analytics Exam - Topic 3 Question 2 Discussion

[Data Prep and Transformation]A Prism data writer has to create an intermediary Prism calculated field A, used only to achieve a final result in Prism calculated field B and they only need to publish out field B. What should they do?
B) Add a Manage Fields stage to the DDS and hide field A.
A) Mark field A as intermediate calculation.
C) Add a Manage Fields stage to the DDS and hide field B.
D) Delete field A from their DDS and just leave field B.

Workday Prism Analytics Exam - Topic 3 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Workday's Workday Prism Analytics exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 3
[All Workday Prism Analytics Questions]

[Data Prep and Transformation]

A Prism data writer has to create an intermediary Prism calculated field A, used only to achieve a final result in Prism calculated field B and they only need to publish out field B. What should they do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Alex at Jun 13, 2025, 10:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Workday Prism Analytics Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cristy
7 months ago
Not sure about this, can we really just ignore field A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
7 months ago
Wait, why would you delete field A? That seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
7 months ago
Hiding field A is a solid choice too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
7 months ago
I agree, that makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
8 months ago
Field A should definitely be marked as intermediate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
8 months ago
Hiding field B seems odd since it's the final output. I think we should focus on field A, but I can't remember the exact steps from my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
8 months ago
I feel like deleting field A could simplify things, but then I worry if that would mess up the calculation for field B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
8 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to manage fields in a similar way. Adding a Manage Fields stage sounds familiar, but I can't recall if we should hide field A or B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
9 months ago
I think marking field A as an intermediate calculation might be the right choice, but I'm not entirely sure how that affects the final output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
9 months ago
I think option A is the way to go here. Marking field A as an intermediate calculation is the cleanest solution and ensures that only the final field B gets published out, which is what we need. Seems like the most efficient way to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
9 months ago
Option D seems like the easiest solution - just delete field A and only publish out field B. That way, I don't have to worry about any intermediate calculations or hiding fields. Might be the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I was thinking option B might work, but I'm not 100% sure if that's the best approach. I'll have to double-check the details on hiding fields in the Manage Fields stage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
9 months ago
This seems straightforward - I'd go with option A and mark field A as an intermediate calculation. That way, it won't get published out, but I can still use it to calculate field B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
12 months ago
You know, I'm feeling a bit mischievous today. I think I'd choose C, just to see the look on the examiner's face. 'Wait, you want me to hide the output field? Brilliant!'
upvoted 0 times
Kati
11 months ago
User 2: That's a good choice. It keeps things organized and clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
11 months ago
User 1: I think I'll go with option A, marking field A as intermediate calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Torie
12 months ago
Hmm, I'd say D is the way to go. Why bother with an intermediary field if you don't need it? Just delete A and let B shine on its own. Efficiency is key, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
Sherill
11 months ago
Agreed, deleting field A and focusing on field B is definitely the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
11 months ago
I think D is the best option too. No need for extra steps if you don't need field A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vicky
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of intermediary fields. I'd go with option B - hide that pesky field A and just publish field B. Keep it simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Lynsey
11 months ago
Definitely, no need to clutter things up with unnecessary intermediary fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
11 months ago
Yeah, that's what I would do too. Keeping it simple is key in data transformation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
12 months ago
Option B sounds like the best choice. Just hide field A and focus on publishing field B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eveline
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to just delete field A and leave field B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
1 year ago
I agree with Stephanie, marking field A as intermediate calculation makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
1 year ago
I think they should mark field A as intermediate calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel