Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Workday Prism Analytics Exam - Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Posted by Vallie on Jun 12, 2025 at 05:31 PM

[Data Prep and Transformation]

You have to blend two sources of dat

a. Your matching field is Employee ID, which is a text-type field in Pipeline 1, but is numeric in Pipeline 2. How do you prepare your data for blending?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium Workday Prism Analytics Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
PA
Paola 10 months ago
Definitely not option D, that won't work.
WI
Willodean 10 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense!
DE
Denny 10 months ago
Wait, can you really join different data types like that?
DE
Delisa 10 months ago
Isn't it risky to change data types mid-process?
RE
Remona 11 months ago
You need to change the field type first before blending.
KA
Kallie 11 months ago
I’m confused about the order. I thought we could do a Join first, but now I’m not so sure if that’s the best approach.
LA
Lashanda 11 months ago
I vaguely recall that we should always match the data types before performing joins. So, I think option C sounds right to me.
FR
Francesco 11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like adding a Filter first might complicate things. I think we usually change the field type before any joins.
NI
Nichelle 12 months ago
I remember we practiced something similar where we had to change data types before blending. I think using Manage Fields first makes sense.
HA
Harris 12 months ago
Ah, I see the issue - the data types don't match up. I'll need to use a Manage Fields to convert one of them before I can blend the data. Shouldn't be too difficult, just need to remember the right order of the steps.
DY
Dyan 12 months ago
Okay, I've got this. I'll use a Manage Fields step to convert the Employee ID field to the same data type, then I can Union or Join the two data sources. Simple!
VA
Vashti 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I think I need to change the field type first, but I'm not sure if I should do that before or after the Union/Join. I'll have to review the module on data prep.
JO
Jose 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the steps carefully to get the data types aligned before blending.
SH
Shenika 1 year ago
A) Add a Manage Fields to change the field type and then Union. Easy peasy, just the way I like it. No need to get fancy, folks.
LI
Lilli 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shenika
Definitely, simplicity is key in data preparation.
TO
Tora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shenika
I agree, no need to overcomplicate things.
SA
Sanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shenika
That's a smart approach, keeping it simple.
EL
Elly 1 year ago
C) Add first a Manage Fields to change the field type and then Join. Ah, the classic 'transform before joining' approach. Bold move, I like it!
CO
Colby 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elly
B) Add a Filter first and then a Manage Fields to change the field type.
VE
Veronika 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elly
A) Add a Manage Fields to change the field type and then Union.
AN
Andra 1 year ago
B) Add a Filter first and then a Manage Fields to change the field type. Hmm, I don't know, that seems a bit roundabout. Why not just go with option A and keep it simple?
TH
Theron 1 year ago
I see both points, but personally I would choose option D) Add a Join first and then a Manage Fields to change the field type for better data blending.
AU
Audry 1 year ago
D) Add a Join first and then a Manage Fields to change the field type. Gotta love a good ol' join before transforming the data. That's the way to do it!
AL
Aleta 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B) Add a Filter first and then a Manage Fields to change the field type would be more efficient.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
I think I would go with option A) Add a Manage Fields to change the field type and then Union.
CH
Chantell 1 year ago
A) Add a Manage Fields to change the field type and then Union. Seems like the straightforward solution to me. No need to overcomplicate things.
DO
Dottie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chantell
Skye: That could work too, but I prefer the direct approach of A).
AR
Arthur 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chantell
User 3: I would go with B) Add a Filter first and then a Manage Fields to change the field type.
SK
Skye 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chantell
User 2: Agreed, keeping it simple is key in data prep.
MI
Mi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chantell
User 1: I think A) Add a Manage Fields to change the field type and then Union is the way to go.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel