Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

WGU (QCO1) Ethics In Technology Exam - Topic 4 Question 1 Discussion

I A recruiter for a cybersecurity company is screening candidates for an engineering role by researching the candidates' public social media profiles. The recruiter notes content on one candidate's profile that automatically allows the recruiter to dismiss the candidate.Which type of content allows the recruiter to legally take this action?
D) Photos depicting use of drugs
A) Posts indicating pregnancy
B) Self-identified as a gender other than what the recruiter wants
C) Photos suggesting actual age is older than indicated on the resume
U) S. employment laws allow employers to consider illegal drug use when making hiring decisions, provided they do not discriminate based on protected characteristics. Why Not the Other Options? A . Posts indicating pregnancy -- Pregnancy is a protected characteristic under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Pregnancy Discrimination Act) and cannot be used to reject a candidate. B . Self-identified gender -- Gender identity is protected under anti-discrimination laws (e.g., U.S. EEOC guidelines). C . Age discrepancy in photos -- Employers must avoid age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Thus, the correct answer is D. Photos depicting use of drugs, as it may legally justify disqualification based on company policies and workplace safety requirements. Reference in Ethics in Technology:
U) S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Guidelines.
U) S. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (1964). Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) (1967).

WGU (QCO1) Ethics In Technology Exam - Topic 4 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for WGU's WGU (QCO1) Ethics In Technology exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 4
[All WGU (QCO1) Ethics In Technology Questions]

I A recruiter for a cybersecurity company is screening candidates for an engineering role by researching the candidates' public social media profiles. The recruiter notes content on one candidate's profile that automatically allows the recruiter to dismiss the candidate.

Which type of content allows the recruiter to legally take this action?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Employers have the right to reject candidates based on public social media content that suggests illegal activity or violates company policies.

Why is drug use a valid reason for dismissal?

Illegal drug use may violate company policies and raise concerns about reliability, safety, and professionalism.

Many industries, especially cybersecurity and government-related jobs, require security clearances, which prohibit drug use.


by Vince at Nov 21, 2025, 12:36 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium WGU (QCO1) Ethics In Technology Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Fabiola
3 months ago
Exactly! We need to focus on safety and legality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
3 months ago
D is definitely the best choice. It’s about company policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
3 months ago
Right! Discrimination laws protect against those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
3 months ago
Agreed! A recruiter has to ensure a safe workplace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
3 months ago
I think D is the only option that makes sense. Drug use is a clear red flag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
4 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize drug use could be a legal reason to disqualify.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
4 months ago
C seems sketchy. Age shouldn't matter if they can do the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
4 months ago
I don't think A or B should be reasons to dismiss anyone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
5 months ago
Definitely D! Drug use is a clear red flag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
5 months ago
Ooh, I bet the recruiter was just itching to use that gender info. Shame they can't, would make their job so much easier. Oh well, guess they'll have to settle for the good old drug test instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
5 months ago
Ah, the good old drug use loophole. Gotta love how employers can still weed out the fun-loving candidates. Though I bet the HR folks wish they could just use the age thing, saves them a lot of time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
5 months ago
Haha, can you imagine if they tried to use the pregnancy thing? That would be a lawsuit waiting to happen! Definitely go with the drug use, keep it nice and legal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
5 months ago
Yep, gotta be careful with those protected characteristics. Wouldn't want to end up in hot water over something like that. The drug use one is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
5 months ago
Hmm, the drug use one seems like the obvious choice, but I'm surprised they can't use the age or gender info. Guess the laws are pretty strict on that stuff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident that drug use is the only clear-cut reason here, but I hope I don't mix up the protections for gender and pregnancy when answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
6 months ago
I feel like I might confuse the age-related issues with the other options. I know age discrimination is a big deal, but I can't remember the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
6 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question about what constitutes discrimination, and I recall that pregnancy and gender identity are definitely protected under the law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and options again to make sure I understand the nuances of the employment laws involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
6 months ago
Alright, I'm feeling pretty confident about this. The drug use is the only factor the recruiter can legally consider, since the other options involve protected characteristics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
6 months ago
I'm a little confused on the specifics of the laws here. I'll need to review the EEOC guidelines and other relevant regulations to make sure I answer this correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
7 months ago
I remember discussing how drug use can be a valid reason for disqualification, but I'm not entirely sure if the other options are protected characteristics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
7 months ago
Seems unfair to judge based on photos alone. What if it was a one-time thing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
7 months ago
But what about A and B? Those are protected!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is understanding what's legally protected and what's not when it comes to hiring decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to really think through the employment laws here to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
Noah
2 months ago
Yeah, the laws are pretty strict on that. Drug use is the only valid reason here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
2 months ago
Age discrimination is a big no-no.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
3 months ago
But what about the age thing? Isn’t that also a concern?
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
7 months ago
I think the drug use photos are a clear reason to dismiss someone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
7 months ago
This is definitely a tough question.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel