Which characteristic applies to solid-state drives (SSDs) compared to magnetic drives?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium Digital Forensics in Cybersecurity (D829) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
Solid-state drives (SSDs) use flash memory and have no moving mechanical parts, making them more resistant to physical shock and damage compared to magnetic drives, which rely on spinning platters.
This resilience makes SSDs favorable in environments with higher physical risk.
However, data recovery from SSDs can be more complex due to wear-leveling and TRIM features.
NIST and forensic hardware guides highlight SSD durability advantages over traditional magnetic storage.
22 comments · newest first
TH
Theron
2 days ago
Wait, are they really cheaper per gigabyte now?
CL
Clarence
7 days ago
B is definitely wrong, SSDs have no moving parts.
GW
Gwenn
12 days ago
Totally disagree with C, SSDs are way faster!
VI
Viva
17 days ago
A) They are less susceptible to damage for sure!
ST
Stefanie
23 days ago
Lower cost per gigabyte? I thought SSDs were pricier!
KA
Kanisha
28 days ago
Wait, are SSDs really that much faster?
AL
Allene
1 month ago
Disagree, magnetic drives can be reliable too.
CH
Chaya
1 month ago
Totally agree, SSDs are way more durable!
DO
Doug
1 month ago
A) They are less susceptible to damage.
TO
Tomas
2 months ago
SSDs are definitely faster than magnetic drives, no doubt!
ED
Edgar
2 months ago
D) They have a lower cost per gigabyte? That can't be right!
MA
Marsha
2 months ago
Wait, are you sure they don't have moving parts?
CH
Charlesetta
2 months ago
Totally agree, SSDs are way more durable!
BR
Brande
2 months ago
A) They are less susceptible to damage.
BL
Blondell
2 months ago
I’m confused about the cost aspect; I thought SSDs were more expensive, so D seems questionable to me.
TA
Tamra
3 months ago
I think I saw a question like this in practice, and it mentioned that SSDs are faster, so C should be out too.
LO
Lorean
3 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like SSDs don’t have moving parts, which makes B wrong.
PA
Pansy
3 months ago
I remember SSDs being more durable, so I think A might be the right answer.
SA
Sage
3 months ago
I’m confused about the cost aspect; I thought SSDs were more expensive per gigabyte compared to magnetic drives.
VA
Vallie
3 months ago
I feel like we covered a question similar to this in class, and I think the answer was about durability.
LA
Lashawnda
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about SSDs being faster than magnetic drives.
JI
Jina
5 months ago
I think SSDs are less susceptible to damage because they don't have moving parts, right?