Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

WGU Accounting for Decision Makers (C213) Exam - Topic 4 Question 1 Discussion

Posted by Janna on May 30, 2026 at 11:41 PM

Which action should a managerial accountant consider taking if confronted by an ethical conflict?

Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is A. Use an objective advisor confidentially. The IMA Statement of Ethical Professional Practice includes guidance for resolving ethical conflict and notes that management accountants may wish to discuss the matter with an objective advisor to obtain a better understanding of possible courses of action. This step is intended to help the accountant evaluate the issue carefully while preserving confidentiality and professionalism.

Option B is not the best answer because going directly to the chief executive officer is not always the first or most appropriate step. Ethical conflict guidance usually recommends following the organization's established chain of command unless the issue involves that level of management. Option C is incorrect because discussing the issue with ''any stakeholder'' could violate confidentiality. Option D is also weaker because consulting a coworker is not the same as seeking advice from an objective and appropriate advisor. The emphasis in professional ethics guidance is on confidentiality, sound judgment, and proper escalation. Therefore, the most suitable action among the options given is to use an objective advisor confidentially, making Option A correct.


Get Premium Accounting for Decision Makers (C213) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
17 comments · newest first
AU
Audrie 23 days ago
Exactly! Better to get unbiased advice first.
MA
Maryln 28 days ago
A keeps it professional without drama.
MI
Miss 1 month ago
D could work, but it depends on the coworker's perspective.
HO
Howard 1 month ago
C is risky. Stakeholders might have their own agendas.
KE
Kenny 1 month ago
True, but it might escalate things too quickly.
KA
Kassandra 2 months ago
But what about B? Reporting to the CEO could resolve issues faster.
AU
Audrie 2 months ago
I agree, A seems safe and confidential.
MA
Maryln 2 months ago
I think A is the best choice. An objective advisor can provide clarity.
CH
Cherelle 2 months ago
A) makes sense, but I wonder if it really helps in tough situations.
RA
Rana 2 months ago
Wait, why not just talk to HR instead?
VI
Vivan 2 months ago
Consulting a coworker can lead to bias, not sure about D.
CO
Coleen 3 months ago
I disagree, going straight to the CEO might be too drastic.
HO
Hobert 3 months ago
A) is the best choice for objective advice.
EA
Earleen 3 months ago
Reporting directly to the CEO seems too drastic unless it’s a serious issue. I’d want to talk to someone first, but I’m not sure who.
LE
Leonora 3 months ago
I feel like conferring with any stakeholder could lead to more complications. I’d probably lean towards consulting a coworker instead.
LE
Leota 3 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to decide whether to report to higher management or consult first. It was tricky!
AU
Audry 4 months ago
I think using an objective advisor confidentially makes sense, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best first step.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel