Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 5V0-93.22 Exam - Topic 9 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-93.22 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 9
[All 5V0-93.22 Questions]

An administrator wants to prevent ransomware that has not been seen before, without blocking other processes.

Which rule should be used?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jimmie at Sep 14, 2024, 09:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-93.22 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Victor
5 months ago
D is risky, it might catch too many false positives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
5 months ago
C seems too broad, could terminate useful processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
5 months ago
Wait, how can we trust it won't block legit apps?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
5 months ago
Definitely agree with B, it's proactive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
6 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense for stopping ransomware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the differences between B and D. Both seem to deal with unlisted applications, but I can't recall which one is more effective against ransomware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
6 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think option D could be a good choice since it targets processes that aren't listed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option C might be too broad since it just says "unknown malware."
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
6 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar because it mentions "ransomware-like behavior," which is what we're trying to catch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
6 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Option B looks like the best choice to me - it specifically mentions terminating processes with ransomware-like behavior, which seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy for this. I'll focus on the key details like preventing new ransomware without blocking other processes, and see which option best matches that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to re-read the question and options closely to make sure I understand the differences between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
7 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they might address the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
2 years ago
Hmm, this one's a toughie. I think I'll have to go with C - better safe than sorry when it comes to unknown malware. Time to send that process packing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
2 years ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I'm gonna go with B, just to be on the safe side. Ransomware is no joke, so let's terminate that sucker!
upvoted 0 times
Sue
1 year ago
User 4: Yeah, let's not take any chances with ransomware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
1 year ago
User 3: Better safe than sorry, let's go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, let's terminate any ransomware-like behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
1 year ago
User 1: I think B is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenny
2 years ago
I'm feeling option A on this one. Deny the operation if it's scraping memory from another process. Sounds like some sneaky adware or PUP to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
2 years ago
Hmm, D looks good to me. If it's not a listed app and it's running, might as well terminate it. No need to let something suspicious stick around, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
2 years ago
I'd go with C. Terminate the process if it's unknown malware that's running. Gotta nip that in the bud before it causes any damage.
upvoted 0 times
Tamra
1 year ago
Dierdre: Better safe than sorry when it comes to dealing with unknown threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that's the best way to prevent any potential damage from happening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 years ago
I agree, we should definitely terminate the process if it's unknown malware.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlene
2 years ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Terminate the process if it's not a known app and exhibits ransomware-like behavior. Better safe than sorry!
upvoted 0 times
Aleshia
2 years ago
Definitely, it's important to have measures in place to stop ransomware before it can cause damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
2 years ago
Better to be safe than sorry when it comes to protecting against unknown threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
2 years ago
Yeah, terminating the process if it's not a known app is a good way to prevent ransomware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
2 years ago
I agree, option B sounds like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincenza
2 years ago
But wouldn't terminating the process be too drastic? I still think A) is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) [Not listed application] [Performs ransomware-like behavior] [Terminate process]
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) [Adware or PUP] [Scrapes memory of another process] [Deny operation]
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel