MENU
An administrator notices that a sensor's local AV signatures are out-of-date.
What effect does this have on newly discovered files?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 5V0-93.22 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
GL
Gladys
2 months ago
A is interesting, but I lean towards D. Outdated signatures mean no protection.
MI
Miesha
2 months ago
I feel like B could be right too. It might just ask the user to decide.
PH
Phyliss
2 months ago
I think the answer is D. The sensor can't block anything without updated signatures.
JO
Jolanda
2 months ago
I disagree, it should still block known threats regardless of signatures.
CA
Carlee
2 months ago
No way, it has to prompt the user first (B).
BR
Brock
2 months ago
Wait, so the sensor can't block anything? That's surprising!
CU
Curtis
3 months ago
I think A could also be a factor.
DO
Dominque
3 months ago
D is definitely the right choice.
OL
Oliva
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards the idea that without updated signatures, the sensor might not be able to block a malicious file effectively.
CH
Charlesetta
3 months ago
I feel like the sensor would still prompt the user to decide on the file, but I can't recall if that's always the case.
TR
Tricia
3 months ago
I remember something about cloud reputation being a fallback, but I'm not sure if that's the main factor here.
PH
Phyliss
4 months ago
I think if the AV signatures are out-of-date, it might affect the sensor's ability to recognize new threats.