New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 5V0-93.22 Exam - Topic 4 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-93.22 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 4
[All 5V0-93.22 Questions]

An administrator notices that a sensor's local AV signatures are out-of-date.

What effect does this have on newly discovered files?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Sabine at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-93.22 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Karol
4 days ago
B) The sensor prompts the end user to allow or deny the file. I hope the end user knows what they're doing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
9 days ago
D) The sensor is unable to block a malicious file. Looks like someone needs to update their AV signatures!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
14 days ago
C) The sensor automatically blocks the new file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
19 days ago
I vaguely recall something about sensors being less effective with outdated signatures, which might mean they can't block malicious files. So, D sounds plausible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
24 days ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like if the signatures are outdated, the sensor might just prompt the user instead of blocking anything. So, B could be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
29 days ago
I remember a practice question where outdated signatures led to a reliance on cloud reputation. Could that mean A is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 month ago
I think if the AV signatures are out-of-date, the sensor might struggle to identify new threats. So, maybe D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
1 month ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. Does the outdated AV mean the sensor can't even detect the new malicious files at all? Or does it just impact the blocking behavior? I'll need to review the answer choices carefully and think through the implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 month ago
This seems straightforward. With outdated AV signatures, the sensor can't properly identify new malware, so it won't be able to automatically block those files. The cloud-based reputation will have to be used instead, and the end user will have to make the call on allowing or denying the file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
2 months ago
Okay, I've got this. If the AV signatures are out-of-date, the sensor won't be able to automatically block new malicious files. It'll have to rely on cloud-based reputation to determine if a file is safe. The end user will likely get prompted to allow or deny the file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. Does the out-of-date AV signature mean the sensor can't properly identify new malware? Or does it just impact the user prompt and blocking behavior? I'll need to think through the implications of the outdated signatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
2 months ago
I think the key here is understanding how the sensor's AV signatures affect its ability to detect and handle new files. If the signatures are out-of-date, that could impact the sensor's reputation-based detection or its ability to automatically block files.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel