Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware Exam 5V0-61.22 Topic 8 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-61.22 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 8
[All 5V0-61.22 Questions]

An administrator of iOS supervised devices has noticed that devices are checking in regularly but are failing the Last Compromised Scan compliance policy. The administrator is fine with having slight disruptions to users but does not want any interaction from the user to be required.

The administrator decides to use an action in the Last Compromised Scan compliance policy that would force the device to report back the compromised status without requiring user input.

Which action m the Last Compromised Scan compliance policy should be used?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by France at Dec 09, 2023, 03:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-61.22 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Leonie
29 days ago
Option D is the way to go, man. Compliance profiles are like the Swiss Army knife of iOS management - they can do it all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 months ago
I'd go with option B. Requesting a device check-in is like asking your dog to fetch the newspaper - it just works. No muss, no fuss!
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
1 months ago
Option A seems like the most straightforward approach. Assigning a sensor to the device should do the job without any fuss. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
Ammie
11 hours ago
Option A seems like the most straightforward approach. Assigning a sensor to the device should do the job without any fuss. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felice
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option D. Assigning a compliance profile with a single app payload could be the way to go. Might as well kill two birds with one stone, right?
upvoted 0 times
Alease
3 days ago
Definitely, that way the device can report back the compromised status without any user interaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
4 days ago
I agree, assigning a compliance profile with a single app payload seems like the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
20 days ago
I think option D is a good choice. It would streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonna
2 months ago
But wouldn't assigning a sensor to the device be more effective in this situation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Assign a push notification to the device to request the compromised status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
2 months ago
Option C looks like the easiest solution. A push notification to the device to get the status? Sounds like a breeze!
upvoted 0 times
Twanna
10 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that would definitely be the least disruptive way to handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
11 days ago
User 1: Option C does seem like the simplest choice. Just send a push notification and get the status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
13 days ago
User 2: Agreed, a push notification would definitely be the simplest way to get the compromised status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
17 days ago
User 1: Option C does seem like the most convenient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
2 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Requesting a device check-in should do the trick without any user interaction. Nice and efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) Assign the command to Request Device Check-In.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel