Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 5V0-22.23 Exam - Topic 7 Question 26 Discussion

A vSAN administrator receives a request from the application team to create a virtual machine on a vSAN datastore. The requirements state that the virtual machine needs to be available quickly after a failure occurs. The solution must minimize administrative effort.Which vSphere feature should the vSAN administrator implement?
C) Fault Tolerance
A) Distributed Services Engine
B) vSphere High Availability
D) vSphere Distributed Resource Scheduler

VMware 5V0-22.23 Exam - Topic 7 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-22.23 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 7
[All 5V0-22.23 Questions]

A vSAN administrator receives a request from the application team to create a virtual machine on a vSAN datastore. The requirements state that the virtual machine needs to be available quickly after a failure occurs. The solution must minimize administrative effort.

Which vSphere feature should the vSAN administrator implement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Pura at Aug 26, 2024, 03:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-22.23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bettina
6 months ago
Surprised that HA is the best option, I thought it was more complex!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
6 months ago
DRS doesn't really fit this scenario, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
7 months ago
Wait, isn't Fault Tolerance better for zero downtime?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
7 months ago
Totally agree, it minimizes downtime effectively!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
7 months ago
I think vSphere High Availability is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
7 months ago
I feel like High Availability is the best option here, but I’m a bit confused about how it compares to Fault Tolerance in terms of administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the Distributed Resource Scheduler is more about resource allocation, not really about quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
8 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think Fault Tolerance might be the right choice since it keeps the VM running without downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
8 months ago
I remember studying about vSphere High Availability, and it seems like it would help with quick recovery after a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards HA. It's designed specifically for high availability and minimal administrative effort, which fits the requirements well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
8 months ago
vSphere DRS could help, but it's more focused on load balancing. I don't think it directly addresses the need for quick availability after a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Fault Tolerance might also work, as it provides continuous availability even during a failure. I'll need to review the details of each feature to decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
8 months ago
I think vSphere High Availability (HA) is the best option here. It provides automatic restart of VMs after a failure, which meets the requirement for quick availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
8 months ago
Distributed Services Engine seems like overkill for this scenario. It's more for advanced networking features. I'd go with the simpler HA solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
8 months ago
Okay, I know the account page has a specific layout, so the number of charts that can be embedded is likely limited. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
2 years ago
I think vSphere Distributed Resource Scheduler might be a good option to consider as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
2 years ago
I'm not sure, I think Fault Tolerance could also be a good choice for quick availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
2 years ago
I agree with Charlena, vSphere High Availability is the best option to minimize administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
2 years ago
Honestly, this is a no-brainer. vSphere High Availability is the perfect solution to meet the given requirements. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Stefanie
2 years ago
B: Agreed, it's the best option to ensure quick availability after a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
2 years ago
A: I think we should go with vSphere High Availability for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beth
2 years ago
Distributed Services Engine? Really? That's overkill for this use case. vSphere High Availability is the clear winner in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
2 years ago
I think we should go with vSphere High Availability for quick availability after a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. Fault Tolerance might be a better option to meet the quick availability requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
2 years ago
A: Yeah, Fault Tolerance could definitely help minimize administrative effort as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 years ago
B: I agree, but Fault Tolerance could also be a good choice to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
2 years ago
A: I think vSphere High Availability might be the best option for quick availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherry
2 years ago
Hmm, I think vSphere High Availability is the way to go here. It ensures quick recovery after a failure and minimizes administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
Kati
2 years ago
I've heard that vSphere Distributed Resource Scheduler can help optimize resource utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
2 years ago
Distributed Services Engine might be worth considering for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
2 years ago
I think Fault Tolerance could also be a good option for minimizing downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
2 years ago
I agree, vSphere High Availability is the best choice for quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel