New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 5V0-22.23 Exam - Topic 7 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-22.23 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 7
[All 5V0-22.23 Questions]

A vSAN administrator receives a request from the application team to create a virtual machine on a vSAN datastore. The requirements state that the virtual machine needs to be available quickly after a failure occurs. The solution must minimize administrative effort.

Which vSphere feature should the vSAN administrator implement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Pura at Aug 26, 2024, 03:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-22.23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bettina
3 months ago
Surprised that HA is the best option, I thought it was more complex!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
3 months ago
DRS doesn't really fit this scenario, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
3 months ago
Wait, isn't Fault Tolerance better for zero downtime?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
Totally agree, it minimizes downtime effectively!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
I think vSphere High Availability is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
4 months ago
I feel like High Availability is the best option here, but I’m a bit confused about how it compares to Fault Tolerance in terms of administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the Distributed Resource Scheduler is more about resource allocation, not really about quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think Fault Tolerance might be the right choice since it keeps the VM running without downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
5 months ago
I remember studying about vSphere High Availability, and it seems like it would help with quick recovery after a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards HA. It's designed specifically for high availability and minimal administrative effort, which fits the requirements well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
5 months ago
vSphere DRS could help, but it's more focused on load balancing. I don't think it directly addresses the need for quick availability after a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Fault Tolerance might also work, as it provides continuous availability even during a failure. I'll need to review the details of each feature to decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
5 months ago
I think vSphere High Availability (HA) is the best option here. It provides automatic restart of VMs after a failure, which meets the requirement for quick availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
Distributed Services Engine seems like overkill for this scenario. It's more for advanced networking features. I'd go with the simpler HA solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
5 months ago
Okay, I know the account page has a specific layout, so the number of charts that can be embedded is likely limited. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
1 year ago
I think vSphere Distributed Resource Scheduler might be a good option to consider as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
1 year ago
I'm not sure, I think Fault Tolerance could also be a good choice for quick availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
1 year ago
I agree with Charlena, vSphere High Availability is the best option to minimize administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 year ago
Honestly, this is a no-brainer. vSphere High Availability is the perfect solution to meet the given requirements. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Stefanie
1 year ago
B: Agreed, it's the best option to ensure quick availability after a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
1 year ago
A: I think we should go with vSphere High Availability for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beth
2 years ago
Distributed Services Engine? Really? That's overkill for this use case. vSphere High Availability is the clear winner in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
2 years ago
I think we should go with vSphere High Availability for quick availability after a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. Fault Tolerance might be a better option to meet the quick availability requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
1 year ago
A: Yeah, Fault Tolerance could definitely help minimize administrative effort as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
1 year ago
B: I agree, but Fault Tolerance could also be a good choice to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
1 year ago
A: I think vSphere High Availability might be the best option for quick availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherry
2 years ago
Hmm, I think vSphere High Availability is the way to go here. It ensures quick recovery after a failure and minimizes administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
Kati
1 year ago
I've heard that vSphere Distributed Resource Scheduler can help optimize resource utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
1 year ago
Distributed Services Engine might be worth considering for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
1 year ago
I think Fault Tolerance could also be a good option for minimizing downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
2 years ago
I agree, vSphere High Availability is the best choice for quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel