New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 5V0-22.23 Exam - Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-22.23 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 4
[All 5V0-22.23 Questions]

A customer has deployed a new vSAN cluster with the following configuration:

5 x vSAN ReadyNodes

All Flash

12 TB Raw Storage

vSAN 8 is deployed with ESA.

New VMs are configured with a RAID-5 VM policy.

Which statement is accurate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Timothy
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the RAID-5 setup? Sounds off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
2 months ago
C sounds right, 4+1 is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
2 months ago
A is correct, it's a 2+1 RAID-5 scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
3 months ago
I think B is misleading, FTT=2 needs more hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
3 months ago
D is definitely true, components are spread out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
3 months ago
I feel like option A is correct, but I need to double-check how vSAN handles RAID-5 configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where RAID-5 was discussed, and I think it was about how data is spread across nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
4 months ago
I remember something about FTT levels, but I can't recall if RAID-5 gives FTT=2 or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
4 months ago
I think RAID-5 uses a 4+1 scheme, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the case with vSAN 8.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
Alright, I think I've got a good strategy here. I'll carefully analyze the cluster configuration and RAID-5 policy details to determine the accurate statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
4 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The RAID-5 policy and vSAN 8 with ESA details are throwing me off. I'll have to review the vSAN documentation to make sure I understand the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
4 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The key is understanding how vSAN's RAID-5 implementation works with the given cluster size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question mentions a 5-node All-Flash vSAN cluster, so I'll need to figure out how vSAN handles RAID-5 in that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky vSAN question. I'll need to carefully consider the details about the cluster configuration and the RAID-5 policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
9 months ago
RAID-5 on vSAN? Somebody call the storage police, this is a crime against data protection!
upvoted 0 times
Talia
9 months ago
Yes, vSAN will spread the components across all of the disk groups for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
9 months ago
I think vSAN will use a 4+1 RAID-5 data placement scheme with parity in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
9 months ago
I agree, it's risky to use RAID-5 on vSAN especially with all flash storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
9 months ago
I know, RAID-5 on vSAN is definitely not recommended for data protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
10 months ago
Wait, they're using 'ReadyNodes' but not 'ReadyCluster'? What is this, an amateur hour?
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
10 months ago
Option D seems a bit too obvious. Of course vSAN will spread the components across all disk groups, that's how it works!
upvoted 0 times
Mari
9 months ago
C) vSAN will use a 4+1 RAID-5 data placement scheme with parity will be used
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
9 months ago
B) RAID 5 will provide an FTT=2 level of protection in this case
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
9 months ago
A) vSAN will use a 2+1 RAID-5 data placement scheme with parity will be used
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lemuel
10 months ago
I'm gonna go with option C. The question says 'new VMs are configured with a RAID-5 VM policy', so it must be a 4+1 RAID-5 scheme.
upvoted 0 times
Kyoko
8 months ago
Definitely, vSAN will use a 4+1 RAID-5 data placement scheme with parity for the new VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
9 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to match the configuration with the VM policy for data protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
9 months ago
I think option C is correct too. It makes sense with the RAID-5 VM policy for new VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chauncey
10 months ago
Option B is wrong. RAID-5 with 5 nodes can only provide FTT=1, not FTT=2. Come on, this is basic vSAN knowledge!
upvoted 0 times
Edna
9 months ago
D) vSAN will spread the components across all of the disk groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
9 months ago
C) vSAN will use a 4+1 RAID-5 data placement scheme with parity will be used
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
10 months ago
B) RAID 5 will provide an FTT=2 level of protection in this case
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
10 months ago
A) vSAN will use a 2+1 RAID-5 data placement scheme with parity will be used
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rozella
11 months ago
I think option A is correct. The 5 ReadyNodes with all-flash storage should use a 2+1 RAID-5 scheme, which aligns with the question.
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
9 months ago
I think we can confidently go with option A for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
10 months ago
That makes sense, it provides a good balance of performance and data protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
10 months ago
Yes, vSAN with all-flash storage typically uses a 2+1 RAID-5 data placement scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
10 months ago
I agree, option A seems to be the most accurate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ora
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) vSAN will spread the components across all of the disk groups makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) vSAN will use a 4+1 RAID-5 data placement scheme with parity will be used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) vSAN will use a 2+1 RAID-5 data placement scheme with parity will be used.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel