VMware 5V0-22.23 Exam - Topic 10 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-22.23 exam

Question #: 17
Topic #: 10

An administrator wants to assign a storage policy to a workload on a two-node vSAN OSA cluster consisting of three disk groups each with nested fault domains. The virtual machine must be protected against a disk or disk group failure.

Which two storage policies meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

ARAID-5/FTT 2

BRAID-1/FTT 3

CRAID-6/FTT 2

DRAID-5/FTT 1

ERAID-1/FTT 1

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Cassie at Apr 29, 2024, 05:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-22.23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lenna

3 months ago

Definitely agree on RAID-6/FTT 2 being a safe bet!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilona

3 months ago

Wait, can RAID-5 really handle that? Seems risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kina

3 months ago

RAID-5/FTT 1 won't cut it for this setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coleen

4 months ago

I think RAID-1/FTT 3 is the better option here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

4 months ago

RAID-6/FTT 2 is a solid choice for disk protection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Man

4 months ago

I feel like RAID-5/FTT 1 is definitely not enough for this scenario. We need more fault tolerance, but I can't recall the exact requirements for nested fault domains.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

4 months ago

I'm a bit confused about RAID-6/FTT 2. Does it really protect against both disk and disk group failures in this setup?

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

4 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question, and I think RAID-1/FTT 3 could work too, since it offers high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

5 months ago

I think RAID-5/FTT 2 might be a good option since it provides protection against a disk failure, but I'm not entirely sure about the nested fault domains.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantell

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to review the vSAN storage policies and how they handle different failure scenarios. Maybe I should jot down some notes and think it through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kara

5 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The key is that the virtual machine needs to be protected against both disk and disk group failures, so RAID-5/FTT 2 and RAID-6/FTT 2 seem like the best options to meet those requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roy

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the nested fault domains part. Does that mean I need to consider how the data is distributed across the different fault domains? I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leah

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around disk and disk group failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantay

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. The question says the virtual machine must be protected against a disk or disk group failure, and the cluster has nested fault domains. I think RAID-5/FTT 2 and RAID-6/FTT 2 might be the right answers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chauncey

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key thing to remember is that public blockchains are, well, public. So the answer has to be that everyone can see the transaction details, not just the initiator or recipient. I'm feeling good about this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pok

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to focus on the specific details in the output, like the estimated row counts and execution times. I'm feeling pretty confident I can nail this one.

upvoted 0 times

...