Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 3V0-32.23 Exam - Topic 7 Question 20 Discussion

A customer wants to deploy Workspace ONE Access for VMware Aria Suite users. The customer wants to achieve the following requirements:95% availability per month, excluding weekendsThe deployment footprint must be minimalWhich design decision should the architect choose?
B) Deploy a single Workspace ONE Access node and protect it with vSphere High Availability.
A) Deploy a single Workspace ONE Access node and protect it with VMware Fault Tolerance.
C) Deploy a Workspace ONE Access cluster and protect it with VMware Fault Tolerance.
D) Deploy a Workspace ONE Access cluster and protect it with vSphere High Availability.

VMware 3V0-32.23 Exam - Topic 7 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 3V0-32.23 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 7
[All 3V0-32.23 Questions]

A customer wants to deploy Workspace ONE Access for VMware Aria Suite users. The customer wants to achieve the following requirements:

95% availability per month, excluding weekends

The deployment footprint must be minimal

Which design decision should the architect choose?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A single node with vSphere High Availability meets the minimal deployment footprint requirement and is sufficient to achieve 95% availability per month (excluding weekends). Clustering or Fault Tolerance would increase complexity and resource usage beyond what is required by the customer's availability target.


by Carisa at Aug 14, 2026, 02:34 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 3V0-32.23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lilli
3 days ago
vSphere HA is solid, but does it really meet the 95% availability?
upvoted 0 times
...
France
8 days ago
Definitely leaning towards option A for simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
13 days ago
Surprised that Fault Tolerance is even an option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
19 days ago
I disagree, option B seems more straightforward for minimal footprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
24 days ago
I think option D is the best choice for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
29 days ago
If weekends are excluded, does that change the need for a cluster? I need to double-check how that impacts the design decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
1 month ago
I feel like deploying a cluster would be the way to go for 95% availability, but I’m torn between Fault Tolerance and High Availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
1 month ago
I think we practiced a similar question where High Availability was preferred for clusters, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
1 month ago
I remember that Fault Tolerance provides continuous availability, but I'm not sure if it’s the best choice for a minimal footprint.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel