Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 2V0-72.22 Exam - Topic 9 Question 74 Discussion

Which two statements are correct regarding the differences between @ConfigurationProperties and @Value? (Choose two.)
C) @ConfigurationProperties is preferable over @Value when type-safety during property binding is a concern. and E) @ConfigurationProperties supports relaxed binding of properties, but not property binding through SpEL.
A) @Value must be used for environment variables, as @ConfigurationProperties cannot access the environment.
B) @Value supports relaxed binding of properties, but not property binding through SpEL.
D) @ConfigurationProperties only bind properties from .properties files, not from .yml files.

VMware 2V0-72.22 Exam - Topic 9 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-72.22 exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 9
[All 2V0-72.22 Questions]

Which two statements are correct regarding the differences between @ConfigurationProperties and @Value? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, E

https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/#features.external-config.typesafe-configuration-properties.vs-value-annotation


by Patti at Jul 14, 2025, 06:20 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 2V0-72.22 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Arthur
7 months ago
Yeah, @Value does support SpEL, but it's not as flexible as @ConfigurationProperties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
7 months ago
@Value is great for simple cases, but @ConfigurationProperties wins for complex ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
7 months ago
@ConfigurationProperties is definitely better for type-safety!
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
8 months ago
I thought @Value could access environment variables too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
8 months ago
Wait, does @ConfigurationProperties really not work with .yml files? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
8 months ago
I vaguely recall that @Value uses SpEL, but I can't remember if @ConfigurationProperties does too. I hope I got that right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
8 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think @ConfigurationProperties is definitely preferable for type-safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
8 months ago
I think @Value can handle environment variables, but I’m a bit confused about relaxed binding. Was that only for @ConfigurationProperties?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
9 months ago
I remember that @ConfigurationProperties is better for type-safety, but I'm not sure if it can access environment variables like @Value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
9 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The differences between the two annotations are well-defined, and I'm ready to tackle this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
9 months ago
Relaxed binding and SpEL support are important distinctions between the two. I'll make sure to highlight those in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key differences seem to be around type-safety and property binding support.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the environment variable part. I'll need to review that before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
10 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the differences between @ConfigurationProperties and @Value correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
12 months ago
That's a good point, Ronnie. @ConfigurationProperties does support relaxed binding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
12 months ago
I believe E is also correct because @ConfigurationProperties supports relaxed binding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
1 year ago
I agree with you, Kaitlyn. @ConfigurationProperties is definitely better for type-safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
1 year ago
B sounds like it could be correct. I remember having issues with SpEL binding when using @Value in the past.
upvoted 0 times
Kassandra
12 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
12 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirk
1 year ago
Ha! Imagine trying to use @Value for environment variables. That's like trying to use a screwdriver to hammer a nail. Definitely A is wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
I think C is correct because @ConfigurationProperties provides type-safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about D. I've used @ConfigurationProperties with YAML files before, so that one doesn't seem right to me.
upvoted 0 times
Gene
12 months ago
E) @ConfigurationProperties supports relaxed binding of properties, but not property binding through SpEL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
12 months ago
C) @ConfigurationProperties is preferable over @Value when type-safety during property binding is a concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherrell
1 year ago
I think C and E are the correct answers. @ConfigurationProperties is great for type-safety, and it supports relaxed binding unlike @Value.
upvoted 0 times
Flo
12 months ago
Yes, @ConfigurationProperties does support relaxed binding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
1 year ago
I agree, @ConfigurationProperties is better for type-safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel