New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 2V0-33.22 Exam - Topic 12 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-33.22 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 12
[All 2V0-33.22 Questions]

A cloud administrator is deploying a new software-defined data center (SDDC) in VMware Cloud on AWS. Long-term planning indicates that a minimum of 30 hosts are required.

What is a valid management network CIDR based on the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The VMware technology that ensures availability of the VMs in your SDDC and uses multiple ESXi hosts to provide rapid recovery from outages and cost-effective high availability for applications is B. vSphere HA. vSphere HA is an agentless cluster-level availability solution that enables rapid recovery from outages and cost-effective high availability for applications. vSphere DRaaS, vSphere DPM, and vSphere eDRS are not suitable for this purpose.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Willard
3 months ago
Wait, can you really use a /16 for just 30 hosts? That seems excessive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
A looks interesting too, but not enough for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
3 months ago
Not so sure about C, seems like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
4 months ago
Definitely agree with C, it provides enough IPs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
4 months ago
I think option C is the best choice for 30 hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
4 months ago
I feel like /20 might be a good compromise, but I’m not confident if it’s the best choice compared to the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to calculate subnet sizes, and I think /16 gives way too many addresses for just 30 hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think a /24 only allows for 256 addresses, which might be too tight for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
5 months ago
I remember that a /23 subnet can support up to 510 hosts, which seems like it could work for 30 hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Based on the requirement of 30 hosts, I'd say option D, 10.1.0.0/20, is the correct answer. That CIDR block provides 4,094 IP addresses, which is more than sufficient for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key here is finding a CIDR block that has enough IP addresses for 30 hosts. I'm thinking option A, 10.4.0.0/23, might be the best choice since it provides 510 IP addresses, which should be more than enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to find a CIDR block that can handle 30 hosts, but I'm not sure how to determine the best one. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward network planning question. I'll start by considering the requirements - we need a CIDR block that can accommodate at least 30 hosts. That narrows it down to a few options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
10 months ago
This is a piece of cake! Eldenryone knows the answer is A) 10.4.0.0/23. What kind of cloud admin doesn't know that?
upvoted 0 times
Joesph
8 months ago
User 3: It's important to have the right network configuration for the SDDC deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothea
8 months ago
User 2: I agree, that's the correct management network CIDR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
8 months ago
User 1: The answer is A) 10.4.0.0/23.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mable
10 months ago
C) 10.2.0.0/16 is the way to go. Why mess around with smaller subnets when you can just use a whole class B network?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards D) 10.1.0.0/20. It seems like it would give us plenty of room to grow in the future.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvie
8 months ago
C) 10.2.0.0/16 could be too large for what we currently require.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
8 months ago
I think B) 10.3.0.0/24 might be too small for our long-term needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
9 months ago
Let's go with D) 10.1.0.0/20 for the management network CIDR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
9 months ago
I agree, D) 10.1.0.0/20 would provide enough hosts for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
9 months ago
I think D) 10.1.0.0/20 is a good choice for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
9 months ago
I agree, D) 10.1.0.0/20 does seem like a good choice for future scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jules
10 months ago
I'm going with B) 10.3.0.0/24. It's a nice, clean /24 subnet, and it should have enough space for the 30 hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
10 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) 10.4.0.0/23. This CIDR block provides 510 IP addresses, which should be enough for the 30 hosts required.
upvoted 0 times
Whitley
9 months ago
D) 10.1.0.0/20 could work, but A) 10.4.0.0/23 seems like a better fit for our requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
9 months ago
C) 10.2.0.0/16 is too large for just 30 hosts, we don't need that many IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
9 months ago
I think B) 10.3.0.0/24 might be too small for 30 hosts, we need more IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
10 months ago
I agree with you, A) 10.4.0.0/23 seems like the best option for the management network CIDR.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
10 months ago
That makes sense, we do need to consider the number of hosts required for the SDDC deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe it should be 10.1.0.0/20 because we need a minimum of 30 hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
11 months ago
I think the valid management network CIDR should be 10.4.0.0/23.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel